On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:08 AM, Amit Langote
wrote:
> On 2016/03/11 8:19, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> Yeha!
>>
>> Fantastic effort, particularly from Masahiko. Well done.
>
> +1!
Yuhu.
--
On 2016/03/11 8:19, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Yeha!
>
> Fantastic effort, particularly from Masahiko. Well done.
+1!
- Amit
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Yeha!
Fantastic effort, particularly from Masahiko. Well done.
--
Peter Geoghegan
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On 2016-03-10 21:16:37 +, Robert Haas wrote:
> Don't vacuum all-frozen pages.
Yeha!
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
Don't vacuum all-frozen pages.
Commit a892234f830e832110f63fc0a2afce2fb21d1584 gave us enough
infrastructure to avoid vacuuming pages where every tuple on the
page is already frozen. So, replace the notion of a scan_all or
whole-table vacuum with the less onerous notion of an "aggressive"