Fabien COELHO wrote:
OK, patch reverted at request of Tom and Peter. Please propose a more
generalitzed soluion. Thanks.
Sigh.
You refuse a 10 lines patch to access a stupid opaque type in the backend.
You both refuse some things to be done in the back end, and also to add
what is needed to do it
I agree with you that work is needed in the acl area.
> I hope you understand the larger scale of problems that would be created
> if your patch got accepted.
I would be ready to bet that I would be the only user for these functions.
So large looks like me alone;-)
Have a nice day,
--
Fabien
> OK, patch reverted at request of Tom and Peter. Please propose a more
> generalitzed soluion. Thanks.
Sigh.
You refuse a 10 lines patch to access a stupid opaque type in the backend.
You both refuse some things to be done in the back end, and also to add
what is needed to do it in userland.
Dear Tom,
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/functions-misc.html
> Arguably these functions do not belong right there, but that's hardly a
> reason to think that they do not need documentation.
Sure. I was planing to add something anyway.
> Personally, though, I think that Peter's
> > Please find a attached a small patch that adds accessor functions
> > for "aclitem" so that it is not an opaque datatype.
>
> Shouldn't this patch include some documentation updates?
Well I thought about that, but I wasn't sure were to put it.
There is no documentation at all about th
OK, patch reverted at request of Tom and Peter. Please propose a more
generalitzed soluion. Thanks.
---
Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> Dear Tom,
>
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/functions-misc.html
> > Argua
CVSROOT:/cvsroot
Module name:pgsql-server
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/05/02 10:38:28
Modified files:
src/backend/utils/adt: acl.c
src/include/catalog: catversion.h pg_proc.h
src/include/utils: acl.h
src/test/regress/expected: privileges
Tom Lane wrote:
> Ergo, my recommendation is to revert this change altogether. Fabien
> should figure out the high-level description of what he wants to know
> (at a level similar to has_table_privilege() and its ilk) and propose
> server-side functions to implement that.
I agree with that.
---
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Neil Conway wrote:
>> Shouldn't this patch include some documentation updates?
> I talked to the author about this. Turns out none of our permission
> functions have docs.
Really? What is Table 9.37 in
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/fun
Neil Conway wrote:
> On 26-Apr-04, at 11:06 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Please find a attached a small patch that adds accessor functions
> > for "aclitem" so that it is not an opaque datatype.
>
> Shouldn't this patch include some documentation updates?
I talked to the author about this
On 26-Apr-04, at 11:06 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Please find a attached a small patch that adds accessor functions
for "aclitem" so that it is not an opaque datatype.
Shouldn't this patch include some documentation updates?
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)-
CVSROOT:/cvsroot
Module name:pgsql-server
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/04/26 12:06:49
Modified files:
src/backend/utils/adt: acl.c
src/include/catalog: catversion.h pg_proc.h
src/include/utils: acl.h
src/test/regress/expected: privileges
12 matches
Mail list logo
