On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 06:43:04AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 01:20:35PM +0300, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> > >Doesn't this invalidate tsvector indexes upgraded by pg_upgrade? Should
> > >they be marked as invalid?
> > Directly, it affects on functional indexes i.e. over to_t
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 01:20:35PM +0300, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> >Doesn't this invalidate tsvector indexes upgraded by pg_upgrade? Should
> >they be marked as invalid?
> Directly, it affects on functional indexes i.e. over to_tsvector(). But it
> affects tsvector column, it should be recreated if
Doesn't this invalidate tsvector indexes upgraded by pg_upgrade? Should
they be marked as invalid?
Directly, it affects on functional indexes i.e. over to_tsvector(). But it
affects tsvector column, it should be recreated if it was generated by
ts_vector() function.
Can you also fix the oth
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 03:29:20PM +, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> Fix support of digits in email/hostnames.
>
> When tsearch was implemented I did several mistakes in hostname/email
> definition rules:
> 1) allow underscore in hostname what prohibited by RFC
> 2) forget to allow leading digits sepa
