Log Message:
---
Added log levels.
Added nice looking logging handlers for running after being forked.
Added ability to debug the raw IRC between the client and the server.
Some code formatting.
Modified Files:
--
docbot:
docbot.pl (r1.9 -> r1.10)
(http://c
Log Message:
---
Fixed spelling of Bhagat (Bhegat -> Bhagat) in credits.
Changed successful learn message to handle more than one keyword in English.
Modified Files:
--
docbot:
docbot.pl (r1.10 -> r1.11)
(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/docbot/
Log Message:
---
Add spinlock support for Itanium processor with Intel compiler.
Vikram Kalsi
Modified Files:
--
pgsql/src/include/storage:
s_lock.h (r1.133 -> r1.134)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/storage/s_lock.h.diff?r1=1
Log Message:
---
Make the behavior of HAVING without GROUP BY conform to the SQL spec.
Formerly, if such a clause contained no aggregate functions we mistakenly
treated it as equivalent to WHERE. Per spec it must cause the query to
be treated as a grouped query of a single group, the same
I wonder how much back-compatibility and dump reloading problems this
might cause? :(
Tom Lane wrote:
Log Message:
---
Make the behavior of HAVING without GROUP BY conform to the SQL spec.
Formerly, if such a clause contained no aggregate functions we mistakenly
treated it as equivalent t
Log Message:
---
Keywords are now ANDed as they were in rtfm_please.
Modified Files:
--
docbot:
docbot.pl (r1.11 -> r1.12)
(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/docbot/docbot/docbot.pl.diff?r1=1.11&r2=1.12)
---(end of broadca
Log Message:
---
Add:
> * Fix cross-compiling of time zone database via 'zic'
Modified Files:
--
pgsql/doc:
TODO (r1.1457 -> r1.1458)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/TODO.diff?r1=1.1457&r2=1.1458)
---(end of b
Log Message:
---
Slight refactoring and optimization of some code in WaitOnLock().
Modified Files:
--
pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr:
lock.c (r1.147 -> r1.148)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c.diff?r1=1.147&r
Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Make the behavior of HAVING without GROUP BY conform to the SQL spec.
> I wonder how much back-compatibility and dump reloading problems this
> might cause? :(
Could happen, but considering that this has been wrong for circ