Unify spelling of canceled, canceling, cancellation
We had previously (af26857a2775e7ceb0916155e931008c2116632f)
established the U.S. spellings as standard.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/21f1e15aafb13ab2430e831a3da7d4d4f525d1ce
Modified Files
Log Message:
---
Modified the Stackbuilder to raise a UAC in case non-administrative user
launches the application
Modified Files:
--
wizard:
CMakeLists.txt (r1.27 - r1.28)
Log Message:
---
Improve error messages.
Modified Files:
--
wizard:
StackBuilder.cpp (r1.16 - r1.17)
(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/stackbuilder/wizard/StackBuilder.cpp?r1=1.16r2=1.17)
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list
Branch refs/heads/REL9_7_STABLE was created.
View: http://git.postgresql.org/pg/shortlog/refs/heads/REL9_7_STABLE
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
Branch refs/heads/REL9_7_STABLE was removed.
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
Just so people don't panic - this is me testing the policy script :-)
//Magnus
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 16:31, pg...@postgresql.org wrote:
Branch refs/heads/REL9_7_STABLE was created.
View: http://git.postgresql.org/pg/shortlog/refs/heads/REL9_7_STABLE
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing
Branch refs/heads/REL9_7_STABLE was created.
View: http://git.postgresql.org/pg/shortlog/refs/heads/REL9_7_STABLE
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
Branch refs/heads/REL9_7_STABLE was removed.
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
Protect pg_stat_reset_shared() against NULL input
Per bug #6082, reported by Steve Haslam
Branch
--
REL9_1_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/3ec6e00ece5fc7483f8890306005f97a2c640861
Modified Files
--
src/backend/utils/adt/pgstatfuncs.c | 14
Protect pg_stat_reset_shared() against NULL input
Per bug #6082, reported by Steve Haslam
Branch
--
REL9_0_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/cbfd82aad252fd86b560a7b7c3d87260a34a595e
Modified Files
--
src/backend/utils/adt/pgstatfuncs.c | 14
Move the PredicateLockRelation() call from nodeSeqscan.c to heapam.c. It's
more consistent that way, since all the other PredicateLock* calls are
made in various heapam.c and index AM functions. The call in nodeSeqscan.c
was unnecessarily aggressive anyway, there's no need to try to lock the
Grab predicate locks on matching tuples in a lossy bitmap heap scan.
Non-lossy case was already handled correctly.
Kevin Grittner
Branch
--
REL9_1_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/1aa447a1e1273e51f1bb34e085c021941db86212
Modified Files
--
Move the PredicateLockRelation() call from nodeSeqscan.c to heapam.c. It's
more consistent that way, since all the other PredicateLock* calls are
made in various heapam.c and index AM functions. The call in nodeSeqscan.c
was unnecessarily aggressive anyway, there's no need to try to lock the
Restore correct btree preprocessing of indexedcol IS NULL conditions.
Such a condition is unsatisfiable in combination with any other type of
btree-indexable condition (since we assume btree operators are always
strict). 8.3 and 8.4 had an explicit test for this, which I removed in
commit
Restore correct btree preprocessing of indexedcol IS NULL conditions.
Such a condition is unsatisfiable in combination with any other type of
btree-indexable condition (since we assume btree operators are always
strict). 8.3 and 8.4 had an explicit test for this, which I removed in
commit
Restore correct btree preprocessing of indexedcol IS NULL conditions.
Such a condition is unsatisfiable in combination with any other type of
btree-indexable condition (since we assume btree operators are always
strict). 8.3 and 8.4 had an explicit test for this, which I removed in
commit
Fix outdated comment
Extracted from a patch by Bernd Helmle
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/b36927fbe922d1aac5d6e42c04eecf65bf37f5f3
Modified Files
--
src/backend/parser/parse_utilcmd.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
17 matches
Mail list logo