On 11/06/2017 11:23 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Stamp 9.2.24.
>
> Uh, I thought 9.2 was EOL.
Actual EOL is always the next minor version after the expiration date.
Otherwise, it'd be the version before the expiration date which is
naturally too s
On 02/20/2016 11:17 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On 20 February 2016 at 10:12, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>> Happy first commit.
>
> Arg. Not so much.
>
> Looks like I broke something -- looking into it now :-(
Happy first commit anyway!
--
Vik Fearing
ode will look really
weird because it'll be missing a version.
Attached is my attempt to fix this. It might not be the best way to do
it, but I feel that *something* should be done.
--
Vik Fearing +33 6 46 75 15 36
http://2ndQuadrant.fr Post
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Andrew Gierth
wrote:
> Avoid having vacuum set reltuples to 0 on non-empty relations in the
> presence of page pins, which leads to serious estimation errors in the
> planner. This particularly affects small heavily-accessed tables,
> especially where locking (e
