Fix typo.
Reported-by: Antonin Houska
Author: Antonin Houska
Backpatch-through: 11, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2246.1578900133@antos
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/dea88c9be27813894081d14a8160c7d2196f4415
Fix typo.
Reported-by: Antonin Houska
Author: Antonin Houska
Backpatch-through: 11, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2246.1578900133@antos
Branch
--
REL_12_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/52bc730381420a8fd9a92e633e217c8ca8c3a54b
Fix comment in heapam.c
Improvement per suggestion from Tom Lane.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fed18699-4270-4778-8da8-10f119a5e...@yesql.se
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/7689d907bbb177fa2a8f5aca3f968761dd16bf28
Fix base backup with database OIDs larger than INT32_MAX
The use of pg_atoi() for parsing a string into an Oid fails for values
larger than INT32_MAX, since OIDs are unsigned. Instead, use
atooid(). While this has less error checking, the contents of the
data directory are expected to be
Fix base backup with database OIDs larger than INT32_MAX
The use of pg_atoi() for parsing a string into an Oid fails for values
larger than INT32_MAX, since OIDs are unsigned. Instead, use
atooid(). While this has less error checking, the contents of the
data directory are expected to be
Reduce size of backend scanner's tables.
Previously, the core scanner's yy_transition[] array had 37045 elements.
Since that number is larger than INT16_MAX, Flex generated the array to
contain 32-bit integers. By reimplementing some of the bulkier scanner
rules, this patch reduces the array to
Revert test added by commit d207038053.
This test was trying to test the mechanism to release kernel FDs as needed
to get us under the max_safe_fds limit in case of spill files. To do that,
it needs to set max_files_per_process to a very low value which doesn't
even permit starting of the server
Revert test added by commit d207038053.
This test was trying to test the mechanism to release kernel FDs as needed
to get us under the max_safe_fds limit in case of spill files. To do that,
it needs to set max_files_per_process to a very low value which doesn't
even permit starting of the server
Revert test added by commit d207038053.
This test was trying to test the mechanism to release kernel FDs as needed
to get us under the max_safe_fds limit in case of spill files. To do that,
it needs to set max_files_per_process to a very low value which doesn't
even permit starting of the server
Revert test added by commit d207038053.
This test was trying to test the mechanism to release kernel FDs as needed
to get us under the max_safe_fds limit in case of spill files. To do that,
it needs to set max_files_per_process to a very low value which doesn't
even permit starting of the server
10 matches
Mail list logo