On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Alvaro, Michael, Peter, and everyone else I'd greatly appreciate if you
> could have a look at the backported version, just about everything but
> v10 had conflicts, some of them not insubstantial.
I have gone through
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 5:23 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Looking at 0002: I agree with the stuff being done here.
The level of details you are providing with a proper error code is an
improvement over the first version proposed in my opinion.
> I think a
> couple of
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Ping. I'm a bit surprised that a bug fixing a significant data
> corruption issue has gotten no reviews at all.
Note that I was planning to look at this problem today and tomorrow my
time, getting stuck for CF handling
introduced, but as those race conditions are really unlikely going to
happen as those concern code paths for slot and decoding creation, just
fix the problem on HEAD.
Author: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180528085747.ga27...@paquier.xyz
Branch
--
master
Details
Fix grammar in REVOKE documentation
Reported-by: Erwin Brandstetter
Branch
--
REL9_5_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/6620b0faf3d18460037fe0922b7f0a355ca021d2
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/ref/revoke.sgml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
Fix grammar in REVOKE documentation
Reported-by: Erwin Brandstetter
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/c83e2029909c5411ca11fd841851016f1f9810e6
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/ref/revoke.sgml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
Fix grammar in REVOKE documentation
Reported-by: Erwin Brandstetter
Branch
--
REL9_3_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/50dfe3a44c65e8abf853d7bdc222002151c7046b
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/ref/revoke.sgml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
Fix grammar in REVOKE documentation
Reported-by: Erwin Brandstetter
Branch
--
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/5bb08c7000db0f3f6621316105de1711f7b559a5
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/ref/revoke.sgml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
Fix grammar in REVOKE documentation
Reported-by: Erwin Brandstetter
Branch
--
REL9_4_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/25a85613b77b9c8b894be2a238ead3716f56a68c
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/ref/revoke.sgml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
Fix grammar in REVOKE documentation
Reported-by: Erwin Brandstetter
Branch
--
REL_10_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/fd73508fd15937da6580bed7080ed77563e7e39f
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/ref/revoke.sgml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
this
is left for a future exercise.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Petr Jelinek, Simon Riggs
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CANP8+jLyS=X-CAk59BJnsxKQfjwrmKicHQykyn52Qj-Q=9g...@mail.gmail.com
Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2840048a-1184-417a-9da8-3299d207a1d7%40postgrespro.ru
Fix grammar in documentation related to checkpoint_flush_after
Reported-by: Christopher Jones
Branch
--
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/256d43128d21891b6090e6fc19668e27da04764b
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml | 4 ++--
1 file
Fix grammar in documentation related to checkpoint_flush_after
Reported-by: Christopher Jones
Branch
--
REL_10_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/858571843c8a5a69527faa3e57f8adfa4165
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml | 4 ++--
1 file
Fix grammar in documentation related to checkpoint_flush_after
Reported-by: Christopher Jones
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/d61bfdda8c2cae671ca4a252993bb8feaa619285
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2
the flags mentioned
above need to be enabled in pg_config.h.win32.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180529211559.gf6...@paquier.xyz
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/bde64eb6107622e8438dd61b93afd4
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:25:27AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov writes:
>> It doesn't contain something particular wrong, but it's just badly
>> formatted. As I can see, we're keeping lines in commit messages no
>> longer than 80 characters when possible. I've commit message with
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 11:01:26AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter writes:
>> Perhaps we could acquire the short.pg domain and run it off that.
>
> We're already using postgr.es, so it's not going to get much shorter
> just from mucking with the domain part. We'd need to set up some
>
Reviewed-by: Tsunakawa Takayuki
Author: Michael Paquier
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F8B57AD@G01JPEXMBYT05
Branch
--
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/5860b22c455ff197d568dabcea591d2afc769f34
Modified Files
Reviewed-by: Tsunakawa Takayuki
Author: Michael Paquier
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F8B57AD@G01JPEXMBYT05
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/70b4f82a4b5cab5fc12ff876235835053e407155
Modified Files
--
src
Reviewed-by: Tsunakawa Takayuki
Author: Michael Paquier
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F8B57AD@G01JPEXMBYT05
Branch
--
REL9_5_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/e41c7954820955c7517b019e2a31d112668ea119
Modified Files
Reviewed-by: Tsunakawa Takayuki
Author: Michael Paquier
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F8B57AD@G01JPEXMBYT05
Branch
--
REL_10_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/fb28104a4baa5488e89fbd7ec2cc7dce1a90fce6
Modified Files
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 09:49:52AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Same is true for the codepaths calling GetRedoRecPtr().
You are right. I'll fix in a minute. A first commit's stress make
things really harder to get right...
> I don't object to the general idea of adding locking - although the
Use optimized bitmap set function for membership test in postgres_fdw
Deparsing logic in postgres_fdw for locking, FROM clause (alias) and Var
(column qualification) does not need to know the exact number of members
involved, which can be calculated with bms_num_members(), but just if
there is
. A lot of cross-checks happen in MergeAttributes() which is
not designed for this purpose, so the tests added in this commit will
make sure that any kind of future refactoring will limit the amount of
compatibility breakage.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion: https
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 06:02:07PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 09:46:17AM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> * Don't assume that you haven't broken the doc build if you make even
>> a trivial doc change. Removing a GUC can break instances in the
>> release notes where
Knizhnik
Author: Konstantin Knizhnik
Reviewed-by: Craig Ringer, Michael Paquier
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/4a243897-0ad8-f471-aa40-242591f24...@postgrespro.ru
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/c55de5e5123ce58ee19a47c08425949599285041
Modified
this code has been introduced.
Reported by: Michael Paquier, Kuntal Ghosh
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh, Magnus Hagander
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180625024356.gd1...@paquier.xyz
Branch
--
REL_10_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff
this code has been introduced.
Reported by: Michael Paquier, Kuntal Ghosh
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh, Magnus Hagander
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180625024356.gd1...@paquier.xyz
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff
Fix description and documentation related to pg_restore --no-comments
These descriptions have been referring to object dump, but a restore
operation is done.
Reported-by: Andrey Lizenko
Author: Andrey Lizenko
Discussion:
uses the brute-force approach of correcting all those code
paths. Some refactoring could happen in the future, but this is let as
future work, which is not targeted for back-branches anyway.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Sharma
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180622061535.gd5
uses the brute-force approach of correcting all those code
paths. Some refactoring could happen in the future, but this is let as
future work, which is not targeted for back-branches anyway.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Sharma
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180622061535.gd5
uses the brute-force approach of correcting all those code
paths. Some refactoring could happen in the future, but this is let as
future work, which is not targeted for back-branches anyway.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Sharma
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180622061535.gd5
uses the brute-force approach of correcting all those code
paths. Some refactoring could happen in the future, but this is let as
future work, which is not targeted for back-branches anyway.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Sharma
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180622061535.gd5
uses the brute-force approach of correcting all those code
paths. Some refactoring could happen in the future, but this is let as
future work, which is not targeted for back-branches anyway.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Sharma
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180622061535.gd5
uses the brute-force approach of correcting all those code
paths. Some refactoring could happen in the future, but this is let as
future work, which is not targeted for back-branches anyway.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Sharma
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180622061535.gd5
there. Documentation also
includes limitations related to the use of temporary tables with
partition trees.
Reported-by: David Rowley
Author: Amit Langote, Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat, Amit Langote, Michael Paquier
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f94Ojk0og9GMkRHGt8wHTW=ijq5kzjkuoboqwlwsvw
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 02:07:37PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I'd rather keep an elog(ERROR) than completely remove the check.
+1.
> Also, for the record, I think the subject line of Michael's commit
> message was pretty unclear about what it was actually doing.
How would you formulate it?
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 12:23:35PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I wonder if we should backpatch this one all the way to pg10. I don't
> see no reason not to.
ABI breakage (if that's the correct wording?). Simply cherry-picking
the patch from master to back-branches would cause extensions and
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 09:05:41PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> I'd categorise this one the same as I have #1 above, i.e. not
> backpatch material. It seems like something useful to look into for
> v12 though. I assumed this was done for a reason and that I just
> didn't understand
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 09:30:20PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On 3 July 2018 at 21:15, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Yeah. Actually I'd like to add a test as well to test the recursion
> > call of expand_partitioned_rtentry. If you have an idea, please let me
> > know o
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 11:16:55PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> Oh okay. Yeah, you can hit that with a partitionless sub-partitioned
> table.
Thanks for the patch and fixing the typo ;)
+create table list_parted_tbl (a int,b int) partition by list (a);
+create table list_parted_tbl1 partition of
Fix typo in comment of commit_ts.c for incorrect reference to CLOG
Author: Shao Bret
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/0aa5e65ab4fd2695f0e4108b9ec53a0546261e1f
Modified Files
--
src/backend/access/transam/commit_ts.c | 3 ++-
1 file
Add verbosity to pg_basebackup for sync
This is useful to know when the data copy has been finished. The
current situation can be confusing for users as the last message is
"waiting for background process to finish streaming", so it looks like
this is taking time but the final sync is instead.
Fix two oversights from 9ebe0572 which refactored cluster_rel
The recheck option became a no-op as ClusterOption failed to set proper
values for each element. There was a second code path where local
options got overwritten.
Both issues have been spotted by Coverity.
Branch
--
master
Make error message of pageinspect more consistent for raw page inputs
There is a copy-paste error from bt_page_items() which got into
bt_page_items_bytea(). A second message in get_raw_page_internal() was
inconsistent with all the other sub-modules.
Author: Ashutosh Sharma
Discussion:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 12:43:29AM +, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Refactor geometric functions and operators
>
> The primary goal of this patch is to eliminate duplicate code and share
> code between different geometric data types more often, to prepare the
> ground for additional patches. Until
Fix handling of pgbench's hash when no argument is provided
Depending on the platform used, this can cause a crash in the worst
case, or an unhelpful error message, so fail gracefully.
Author: Fabien Coelho
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/alpine.DEB.2.21.1807262302550.29874@lancre
Backpatch:
Fix handling of pgbench's hash when no argument is provided
Depending on the platform used, this can cause a crash in the worst
case, or an unhelpful error message, so fail gracefully.
Author: Fabien Coelho
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/alpine.DEB.2.21.1807262302550.29874@lancre
Backpatch:
On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 11:21:28AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> That looks good as far as it goes. I didn't cross-check that you
> hit everyplace that needs this, but if you grepped for references to
> ENOSPC then you presumably found them all.
That's exactly how the history goes.
> IMO, it's OK to
.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31797.1533326...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/5a23c74b63ec9f63c648f79b13a900c37332ee55
Modified Files
--
src/backend/access
.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31797.1533326...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
REL9_5_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/afd5fde856675f54a7b5d857f7a173f9a3237b57
Modified Files
--
src/backend
.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31797.1533326...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
REL_10_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/7124e64520834cd238c9f0efcfe429c28696b11d
Modified Files
--
src/backend
.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31797.1533326...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/58673b4a5fdff4d0d327c2d07e0cf8743f86f44c
Modified Files
--
src/backend
.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31797.1533326...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
REL9_4_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/e69a3ac4a3e0ba640264a94dded197c21c33aa11
Modified Files
--
src/backend
.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31797.1533326...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/f5b4bb88120f8945ead702bec0e4eaf46542e8f3
Modified Files
--
src/backend
for CLUSTER, no back-patch is done.
Reported-by: Lloyd Albin, Jeremy Schneider
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed by: Nathan Bossart, Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/152512087100.19803.12733865831237526...@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180806165816.ga19
is the table owner
- The user is the database/schema owner, only if the relation worked on
is not shared.
Robert has worded most the documentation changes, and I have coded the
core part.
Reported-by: Lloyd Albin, Jeremy Schneider
Author: Michael Paquier, Robert Haas
Reviewed by: Nathan Bossart
is the table owner
- The user is the database/schema owner, only if the relation worked on
is not shared.
Robert has worded most the documentation changes, and I have coded the
core part.
Reported-by: Lloyd Albin, Jeremy Schneider
Author: Michael Paquier, Robert Haas
Reviewed by: Nathan Bossart
Update comment in header of errcodes.txt
This file mentions all the files generated from it, but missed that
errcodes-list.sgml is no more, while errcodes-table.sgml is.
Author: Noriyoshi Shinoda
Discussion:
Mention ownership requirements for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW in docs
Author: Dian Fay
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/745abbd2-a1a0-ead8-2cb2-768c16747...@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.3
Branch
--
REL9_3_STABLE
Details
---
Mention ownership requirements for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW in docs
Author: Dian Fay
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/745abbd2-a1a0-ead8-2cb2-768c16747...@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.3
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
Mention ownership requirements for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW in docs
Author: Dian Fay
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/745abbd2-a1a0-ead8-2cb2-768c16747...@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.3
Branch
--
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
---
Mention ownership requirements for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW in docs
Author: Dian Fay
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/745abbd2-a1a0-ead8-2cb2-768c16747...@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.3
Branch
--
REL9_5_STABLE
Details
---
Mention ownership requirements for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW in docs
Author: Dian Fay
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/745abbd2-a1a0-ead8-2cb2-768c16747...@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.3
Branch
--
master
Details
---
Mention ownership requirements for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW in docs
Author: Dian Fay
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/745abbd2-a1a0-ead8-2cb2-768c16747...@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.3
Branch
--
REL9_4_STABLE
Details
---
Mention ownership requirements for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW in docs
Author: Dian Fay
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/745abbd2-a1a0-ead8-2cb2-768c16747...@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.3
Branch
--
REL_10_STABLE
Details
---
been written in
its first version by Tsunakawa Takayuki, then heavily reviewed by me.
Author: Tsunakawa Takayuki
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Andres Freund
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F8A4DC6@G01JPEXMBYT05
Backpatch: 11-, as PGPROC gains
been written in
its first version by Tsunakawa Takayuki, then heavily reviewed by me.
Author: Tsunakawa Takayuki
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Andres Freund
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F8A4DC6@G01JPEXMBYT05
Backpatch: 11-, as PGPROC gains
Clarify comment about assignment and reset of temp namespace ID in MyProc
The new wording comes from Álvaro, which I modified a bit.
Reported-by: Andres Freund, Álvaro Herrera
Author: Álvaro Herrera, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180809165047.gk13...@paquier.xyz
Backpatch
Clarify comment about assignment and reset of temp namespace ID in MyProc
The new wording comes from Álvaro, which I modified a bit.
Reported-by: Andres Freund, Álvaro Herrera
Author: Álvaro Herrera, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180809165047.gk13...@paquier.xyz
Backpatch
with future features.
- GSSAPI authentication missed two translations.
- vacuumdb handles non-translated strings.
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/20180810.152131.31921918.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Fix typo in description of enable_parallel_hash
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/20180821.115841.93250330.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/87c596cda6d7c79266cde44a1e9fc8ea1b8acefa
Fix typo in description of enable_parallel_hash
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/20180821.115841.93250330.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/d8c83800c3ed2f0d677eb6620a9e9dc7b81a678b
Modified
with future features.
- GSSAPI authentication missed two translations.
- vacuumdb handles non-translated strings.
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/20180810.152131.31921918.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp
with future features.
- GSSAPI authentication missed two translations.
- vacuumdb handles non-translated strings.
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/20180810.152131.31921918.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp
with future features.
- GSSAPI authentication missed two translations.
- vacuumdb handles non-translated strings.
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/20180810.152131.31921918.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp
: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/20180810.152131.31921918.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Backpatch-through: 9.3
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/72be8c29a18812975fcc8765a122faf0e4d0c755
Modified
Fix set of NLS translation issues
While monitoring the code, it has been noticed that GSSAPI
authentication missed two translations.
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/20180810.152131.31921918
refactoring related to ownership checks for relations
vacuumed or analyzed.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2018081142.ga6...@paquier.xyz
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff
if the parent table is defined as such. Knowing
about such sequences has no meaning without their parent table anyway.
Reported-by: Andy Abelisto
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, Michael Paquier
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/153479393218.1316.8472285660264976
if the parent table is defined as such. Knowing
about such sequences has no meaning without their parent table anyway.
Reported-by: Andy Abelisto
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, Michael Paquier
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/153479393218.1316.8472285660264976
if the parent table is defined as such. Knowing
about such sequences has no meaning without their parent table anyway.
Reported-by: Andy Abelisto
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, Michael Paquier
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/153479393218.1316.8472285660264976
tables is present since
10.
Author: Nathan Bossart
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/dc186201-b01f-4a66-9ec4-f855a957c...@amazon.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/a569eea6998a26689409ff6eb5fce2c1eab0f5e1
Modified Files
Fix documentation for run-time partition pruning
Since 5220bb7, not only Append, but also MergeAppend support the
operation.
Author: Amit Langote
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/59d8eb92-4536-c44e-54e2-305b9b3d8...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Branch
--
master
Details
---
consistent. A basic set
of TAP tests has been added while on it.
Author: Tatsuro Yamada
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/c7e7f25c-1747-cd0f-9335-390bc97b2...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff
with other things.
Author: Tatsuro Yamada
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/c7e7f25c-1747-cd0f-9335-390bc97b2...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/1aaf532deabfa356c99abc80fc78d988ad1f1355
Modified Files
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:08:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Digging, this is because the "make check" processing isn't actually
>> installing oid2name (resp. vacuumlo) into the temp installation tree :-(.
>>
>> I don't think this is the fault of your tests, exactly --- there's
>>
implemented vacuum for partitioned
tables. The original problem reported related to early lock queue for
critical relations is fixed anyway, so priority is given to avoiding a
backward-incompatible behavior.
Reported-by: Lloyd Albin, Jeremy Schneider
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed by: Nathan Bossart
to that.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180718062202.gc8...@paquier.xyz
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/c6598b8b0514bcb9b4c99f2412927368a7514180
Modified Files
--
src/backend/optimizer/util
to that.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180718062202.gc8...@paquier.xyz
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/6365ebacdd08f988cd31572c7190c8f08194bf5d
Modified Files
--
src/backend/optimizer
and additions.
Author: Sawada Masahiko
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBQMLoc=ohh-oocuapselrmk8_esrjjoyr8fqlzkbe...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/164ed1532f78574a904b4bd080c28105a45e2765
Modified
and additions.
Author: Sawada Masahiko
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBQMLoc=ohh-oocuapselrmk8_esrjjoyr8fqlzkbe...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/b33ef397a1698ddd06f325d0f92a6643ec55577f
Modified Files
and additions.
Author: Sawada Masahiko
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBQMLoc=ohh-oocuapselrmk8_esrjjoyr8fqlzkbe...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/bc62aef53d686b282f164277da0f2405a4fd0ac3
Modified
and additions.
Author: Sawada Masahiko
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBQMLoc=ohh-oocuapselrmk8_esrjjoyr8fqlzkbe...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
REL9_5_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/3ecd6c4ab9ddfe22e0c6df0fba412c900614aa23
Modified
and additions.
Author: Sawada Masahiko
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBQMLoc=ohh-oocuapselrmk8_esrjjoyr8fqlzkbe...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
REL_10_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/49d506dd2162c1798150bab18d7c332d29b4aa93
Modified
Bump catalog version for recent toast table additions
This has been forgotten in 96cdeae.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/f2b1316a94796b69eed6773cfb38267947ea19ac
Modified Files
--
src/include/catalog/catversion.h | 2 +-
1 file changed,
, exclude
pg_largeobject and pg_largeobject_metadata from the set as large object
data is handled as user data. Those relations have no reason to use a
toast table anyway.
Author: Joe Conway, John Naylor
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/84ddff04-f122-784b
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 09:14:14AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Thanks for double-checking, pushed.
This attempt made longfin happier for the path patched, but there were a
couple of other ones which were hidden behind. I got them fixed now,
which should bring the machine back to gr
Fix more portability issues with casts to Size when using off_t
This should tame the beast, as there are no other places where off_t is
used in the new error messages.
Reported again by longfin, which complained about walsender.c while I
spotted the other two ones while double-checking.
Branch
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 07:23:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
> > Rework error messages around file handling
>
> longfin thinks you missed at least one cast ...
Hm, I checked that. Just casting to (Size) should do it. I cannot get
a warning with neithe
1 - 100 of 3677 matches
Mail list logo