On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 07:45:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
> > On 06/08/2018 00:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Anyway, I'd like to propose a compromise position that I don't think
> >> has been discussed before: let's drop release notes for branches
> >> that were already EOL
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 06/08/2018 00:57, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Anyway, I'd like to propose a compromise position that I don't think
>> has been discussed before: let's drop release notes for branches
>> that were already EOL when a given branch was released.
> Why not go further and just
On 06/08/2018 00:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> Anyway, I'd like to propose a compromise position that I don't think
> has been discussed before: let's drop release notes for branches
> that were already EOL when a given branch was released. So for
> example, 9.3 and before would go away from v12, due out
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 08:54:16AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-grant.html
> Description:
>
> This line:
>
> The entries shown by \dp are interpreted thus:
>
>
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 10:14:33AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:18:27PM +1200, Morgan Owens wrote:
> > On 2018-08-09 05:24, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 09:14:48AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > >>The following documentation comment has been
