On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 09:20:34AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 10:11:59PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 02:21:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > I still find this to be more confusing than helpful. In particular,
> > > I do not think that it's pos
Daniel Cory writes:
> Can we document that "pow" is the same as "power"?
Meh. power() is the SQL-standard spelling; I don't see a good reason to
encourage people to use the legacy name. We might hope to get rid of
that name someday (cf commit fc7fd5018).
> Can we document "int4larger" and rela
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Daniel Cory wrote:
> Can we document that “pow” is the same as “power”? It is not listed on
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-math.html, even
> though both “ceil” and “ceiling” are listed.
>
> For aliased function names for which only one i
Can we document that "pow" is the same as "power"? It is not listed on
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-math.html, even though
both "ceil" and "ceiling" are listed.
Can we document "int4larger" and related functions? They are similar to the
greatest/least functions but n
