On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 11:49:31AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 02:17:33PM +0300, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> >> What is your opinion? Should we renounce the additional manual step and use
> >> only the pure "Optimized SVG" format? This will increase the
> >
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 02:17:33PM +0300, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
>> What is your opinion? Should we renounce the additional manual step and use
>> only the pure "Optimized SVG" format? This will increase the
>> 'diff-ablility', which may be valuable in the long term. But direc
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 02:17:33PM +0300, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> As an example of such differences I append two files: gin.svg ("Optimized
> SVG" plus my manually optimizations; the originally uploaded file) and
> gin_pure_opt.svg (pure "Optimized SVG").
>
> What is your opinion? Should we renounce
On 08.03.19 18:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
How do you get from the Inkscape SVG files to the what you call
"optimized SVG" files?
I loaded the gin_inkscape.svg file into Inkscape, saved it back out as
"Plain SVG", but the resultant file did not look at all similar to the
existing gin.svg.
Inksc
