On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:49:14AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Good catch. If you look at the code (ecpg.trailer), connection_object
> refers to the name of the parameter, while connection_name refers to
> "AS connection_object" as a whole. So it seems to me that the
> intention is to use
PG Doc comments form writes:
> F.10. dblink is noted at top of version 11 documentation, and F.11. dblink
> on version 10 documentaion. They appear to be reversed.
You're mistaking documentation section numbers for versions. Comparing
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/contrib.html
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/contrib-dblink-connect.html
Description:
F.10. dblink is noted at top of version 11 documentation, and F.11. dblink
on version 10 documentaion. They appear to be reversed.
