Hello, Bruce. (We met at the OUGN conference last March on the Oslo-Kiel
ferry.) Thanks for your reply.
1. About AUTOCOMMIT
It’s very hard to get a clear account of what AUTOCOMMIT really is. So consider
the example from the docs section that I cited, and run these psql commands at
its prompt
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/logical-replication-conflicts.html
Description:
I have a pretty detailed setup, and can provide more details if desired, but
the real issue is that I am seeing an error like the following:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 01:30:49PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > > Now, maybe the table should be defined somewhere in perform.sgml - I
> > > don't recall why exactly I chose not to do that, maybe because there is
> > > no universal definition (one country uses text, another number, ...)
> >
> >
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:05:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, agreed. I can do it, or do you want to?
> Uh, I am feeling I can't do anything with the tree until Friday because
> of the PG 12 packaging, right?
There's not a freeze on docs, as far as I'm concerned. I
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:05:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Our current docs have this text for PREPARE:
> >Prepared statements can use generic plans rather than re-planning
> >with each set of supplied EXECUTE values. This occurs immediately
> >fo
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Our current docs have this text for PREPARE:
>Prepared statements can use generic plans rather than re-planning
>with each set of supplied EXECUTE values. This occurs immediately
>for prepared statements with no parameters; otherwise it occurs
>
Our current docs have this text for PREPARE:
Prepared statements can use generic plans rather than re-planning
with each set of supplied EXECUTE values. This occurs immediately
for prepared statements with no parameters; otherwise it occurs
only after five or more execu
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 04:11:47AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/plpgsql-transactions.html
> Description:
>
> This chapter fails to state:
>
> (1) If a PL/pgSQL procedure issue
Thanks for your attention! That sentence made me believe the style guide was outdated, but then I found fairly recent posts referring to it and got confused.On Sep 26, 2019 10:53, Peter Eisentraut wrote:On 2019-09-25 00:13, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
>> PostgreSQL 12 requires C9
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/plpgsql-transactions.html
Description:
This chapter fails to state:
(1) If a PL/pgSQL procedure issues "commit" then it must be called with
AUTOCOMMIT set to On. This is counter-intuitive
Hi,
I’m terribly sorry for the delay of response.
>This does not really seem like an improvement. The second formulation is
>pedantically correct, but also unintelligible.
>
> Maybe we could make it say "run in parallel with non-DDL activity" ?
I completely agree with you, therefore, I amended i
11 matches
Mail list logo
