>> On 19 Nov 2019, at 14:20, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>
>>
>> -Copies an existing logical replication slot name
>> src_slot_name
>> +Copies an existing logical replication slot named
>> src_slot_name
>
> +1
Fix committed/pushed to master and REL_12_STABLE branches.
Best re
On Tue, 2019-11-19 at 13:21 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Laurenz Albe writes:
> > On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 13:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Laurenz Albe writes:
> > > > On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 17:17 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > > It might be worth clarifying this point in section 5.7,
> > > > > https:
On Tue, 2019-11-19 at 18:55 +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> I experimented with Bulk load and COPY.
> Loading in COPY was very fast.
> However, after COPYing data from a CSV file to PostgreSQL Table. The query
> execution took lot of time for 1 of the first 4 queries.
> Only this slow query w
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/sql-copy.html
Description:
Hello,
Myself Mayank. I am a Ph.D. student.
I experimented with Bulk load and COPY.
Loading in COPY was very fast.
However, after COPYing data from a CSV fil
Andreas Kretschmer writes:
> it would be good if we can also add this to chapter 7.8, wouldn't it?
I don't feel a need to. 7.8 isn't attempting to define the syntax
precisely. Moreover, we've had this feature since 8.4, and this
is the first I've heard of somebody misinterpreting the syntax;
so
Laurenz Albe writes:
> On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 13:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Laurenz Albe writes:
>>> On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 17:17 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
It might be worth clarifying this point in section 5.7,
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/ddl-priv.html
> I like your second sent
Liudmila Mantrova writes:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:00 AM Laurenz Albe
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2019-11-18 at 23:35 +0300, Liudmila Mantrova wrote:
>>> I am a bit uncomfortable about having details about the workings of
>>> binary packages for specific operating systems in the core
>>> documentatio
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:00 AM Laurenz Albe
wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-11-18 at 23:35 +0300, Liudmila Mantrova wrote:
> > > I am a bit uncomfortable about having details about the workings of
> > > binary packages for specific operating systems in the core
> documentation.
> > > Maybe I'm too sensit
> On 19 Nov 2019, at 14:20, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>
> -Copies an existing logical replication slot name
> src_slot_name
> +Copies an existing logical replication slot named
> src_slot_name
+1
cheers ./daniel
Thank you Magnus.
Now I see the correct pdf.
Cheers, William
From: Magnus Hagander
Sent: Dienstag, 19. November 2019 09:51
To: Daniel Gustafsson
Cc: Sescu William (SW0) ; PostgreSQL WWW
; pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Dave Page
Subject: Re: A4 pdf points to 11.5 instead of 11.6
On Tue
There's a very small typo in func.sgml. Patch attached.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
index 28eb322f3f..e8082c05c9 100644
--- a/doc/src/sg
Am 18.11.19 um 20:12 schrieb Andreas Kretschmer:
Am 18.11.19 um 18:32 schrieb Tom Lane:
Andreas Kretschmer writes:
One of our customers had problems with the syntax of WITH RECURSIVE. He
suggested that the documentation should be improved, maybe with this
sentence:
"If any of the CTEs is
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:34 AM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 19 Nov 2019, at 09:09, William Sescu (Suva)
> wrote:
>
> > If I download the A4 pdf of the version 11, it says 11.5 documentation.
> >
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/
> >
> > However, it should contain the 11.6 document
> On 19 Nov 2019, at 09:09, William Sescu (Suva) wrote:
> If I download the A4 pdf of the version 11, it says 11.5 documentation.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/
>
> However, it should contain the 11.6 documentation. Shouldn’t it?
>It indeed should. Looking at the other versions,
> On 19 Nov 2019, at 09:09, William Sescu (Suva) wrote:
> If I download the A4 pdf of the version 11, it says 11.5 documentation.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/
>
> However, it should contain the 11.6 documentation. Shouldn’t it?
It indeed should. Looking at the other versions
Hello
If I download the A4 pdf of the version 11, it says 11.5 documentation.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/
However, it should contain the 11.6 documentation. Shouldn't it?
Cheers
William
William Sescu | Oracle/PostgreSQL DBA | MAA 12c OCM
Suva | Rösslimattstrasse 39 | 6005 Luzern
On Mon, 2019-11-18 at 23:35 +0300, Liudmila Mantrova wrote:
> > I am a bit uncomfortable about having details about the workings of
> > binary packages for specific operating systems in the core documentation.
> > Maybe I'm too sensitive there, but what about having these parts in the Wiki
> > and
17 matches
Mail list logo
