On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 10:58:51AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Un, 'on' does _not_ apply the WAL data, and remote_apply does do remote
> fsync. If you want to go in order of severity, with the most severe
> first, it is:
>
> remote_apply
> on
> remote_write
> local
>
>
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 5:29 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 03:56:32PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> >
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/functions-textsearch.html
> > Description:
> >
> > A
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 8:46 AM Jürgen Purtz wrote:
>
> On 06.08.20 10:12, David G. Johnston wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:18 AM Jürgen Purtz wrote:
>
>>
>> > Why?
>>
>> Because it can hinder the learning process.
>
>
>
> Such a "make current" patch that covers this complaint seems reasona
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 12:50:34PM +0200, Kasper Kondzielski wrote:
> Hi, thanks for the reply.
>
> To be honest I don't think it is better. Previously paragraph about
> remote_apply was after paragraph about `on` and before remote_write which
> followed natural order in terms of how strict these
Hi, thanks for the reply.
To be honest I don't think it is better. Previously paragraph about
remote_apply was after paragraph about `on` and before remote_write which
followed natural order in terms of how strict these parameters are (i.e.
how strong are the guarantees they provide). Because of t
