Laurenz Albe writes:
> On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 13:24 +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
>> On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 14:26 +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>>> If I understand correctly, it would be helpful to add this sentence or a
>>> corrected version of it: "Triggers always execute in the same transaction
Laurenz Albe writes:
> On Fri, 2021-07-23 at 23:07 +0200, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
>> Done at the proposed pages - and a few more.
> Looks good to me - changed to "ready for committer".
Pushed with a bit of editorialization:
* I removed the glossary entry for "Domain (Internet)". AFAICS we
have not
OK, I'll put something for you to review. Most programmers simply ignore
locking and wonder why it sometimes goes wrong.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 2:22 PM David G. Johnston <
david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 8:44 PM Anthony Berglas
> wrote:
>
>> My point is that while
My point is that while I can follow the academic style discussion, most of
my colleagues could not. They just need to have a clear idea of how to
handle the common case, which is to use a database using some programming
language.
Early on, for Read Committed, it should discuss and ideally provide
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/datatype-numeric.html
Description:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/datatype-numeric.html says that the range
of a numeric type integer is -2147483648 to +2147483647 but
PGTYPESnumeric_t
Hi
pá 30. 7. 2021 v 0:24 odesílatel Bruce Momjian napsal:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 01:45:12PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> >
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/ddl-partitioning.html
> > Description:
> >
>
