rir writes:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 04:24:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, as it stands, the diagram is ambiguous
>> because there are two ways to parse
>> FETCH cursor_name
>> ... is present but empty, or omitted altogether?
> I am confident you know what you mean, but I don't. At the _pa
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 04:24:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> rir writes:
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 07:58:47AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> >> Can you think of a way to modify the syntax diagram so that it
> >> expresses that and still remains comprehensible?
>
> > For myself,
> >'FETCH [ [
