Re: Correction for vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age

2021-10-11 Thread Laurenz Albe
On Tue, 2021-10-12 at 08:22 +0300, Pavel Luzanov wrote: > When trying to make a link to the new vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age parameter, > I found the wrong ID for this guc (missed word vacuum). > Please consider this patch for a fix. It is good to be consistent, but the name of the link is not es

Re: small patch

2021-10-11 Thread Laurenz Albe
On Mon, 2021-10-11 at 23:14 -0400, rir wrote: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 04:15:01PM -0400, rir wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 02:47:43PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote: > > > On Thu, 2021-10-07 at 16:06 -0400, rir wrote: > > > > FETCH [ direction ] [ FROM | IN ] cursor_name > > Should the pgplsql d

Correction for vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age

2021-10-11 Thread Pavel Luzanov
Hello, When trying to make a link to the new vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age parameter, I found the wrong ID for this guc (missed word vacuum). Please consider this patch for a fix. -- Pavel Luzanov Postgres Professional: https://postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company diff --git a/doc/src/s

Re: small patch

2021-10-11 Thread rir
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 04:15:01PM -0400, rir wrote: > On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 02:47:43PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-10-07 at 16:06 -0400, rir wrote: > > FETCH [ direction ] [ FROM | IN ] cursor_name Should the pgplsql docs be similiarly changed per the above in 43.7.3.1 and 2?

Re: Analyze on Foreign Data Wrappers - clarification

2021-10-11 Thread David G. Johnston
On Monday, October 11, 2021, PG Doc comments form wrote: > > Foreign tables are analyzed only when explicitly selected. > > 2. When I run the analyze command with the FDW table as a parameter > > That > Also, I am not clear if analyze is run on FDW tables when Automvacuum runs; > does it run an

Analyze on Foreign Data Wrappers - clarification

2021-10-11 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/sql-analyze.html Description: Foreign tables are analyzed only when explicitly selected. Nothing wrong just maybe my newness to PG. I don't understand what "selected" means here: 1.

Re: 9.17. Sequence Manipulation Functions

2021-10-11 Thread Andrii Cherevko
Thanks a lot! пт, 8 жовт. 2021 о 16:27 Pantelis Theodosiou пише: > > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 12:12 PM PG Doc comments form < > nore...@postgresql.org> wrote: > >> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: >> >> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/functions-sequenc

Re: Remove unary operator documentation https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-oid.html

2021-10-11 Thread Laurenz Albe
On Mon, 2021-10-11 at 07:03 +, PG Doc comments form wrote: > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/datatype-oid.html > Description: > > On page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-oid.html, for > regoperator the example "-(NONE,​integer)" is mentioned. Do I understand > correct

Remove unary operator documentation https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-oid.html

2021-10-11 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/datatype-oid.html Description: On page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-oid.html, for regoperator the example "-(NONE,​integer)" is mentioned. Do I understand correctly tha