Hi,
It won't be reflected on the website until 14.1 is released, though.
Thank you! I had completely forgotten about that and looking for changes
on the website.
--
Pavel Luzanov
Postgres Professional: https://postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 1:58 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> It is in 14.
Right. It won't be reflected on the website until 14.1 is released, though.
--
Peter Geoghegan
On 2021-Oct-28, Pavel Luzanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Agreed. Pushed Pavel's patch just now.
>
> Sorry, I didn't check it right away.
> But it makes sense to backport to v14, where vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age
> was introduced.
It is in 14.
Author: Peter Geoghegan
Branch: master [00c61a74b] 2021
Hi,
Agreed. Pushed Pavel's patch just now.
Sorry, I didn't check it right away.
But it makes sense to backport to v14, where vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age was
introduced.
--
Pavel Luzanov
Postgres Professional: https://postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 01:34:40PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> AFAICT it's the same document, but updated. If we want to leave 9.6 in as
> much
> of a working state as possible I think it makes sense to change to that one.
> I'm happy to do it if you concur.
Sure. That's fine by me.
--
Mi
> On 28 Oct 2021, at 02:28, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 05:09:41PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Indeed, that's broken. Will fix as per your suggestion.
>
> And done down to 10 as of cc1853b. 9.6 used a different link that was
> already dead, and this version will be
