On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 08:12, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 8:19 PM Dave Cramer
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 07:03, Laurenz Albe
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 2021-12-19 at 21:08 +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> >> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/continu
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 8:19 PM Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 07:03, Laurenz Albe wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 2021-12-19 at 21:08 +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/continuous-archiving.html
>> > Description:
>> >
>> > It appears that this ma
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 07:19:32AM -0500, Dave Cramer wrote:
> The docs say it returns 3 values ?
They do. Here is the relevant part:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions-admin.html#FUNCTIONS-ADMIN-BACKUP
"The result of the function is a single record. The lsn column holds
the backup's
On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 07:03, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-12-19 at 21:08 +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/continuous-archiving.html
> > Description:
> >
> > It appears that this may be out of date.
> >
> > pg_stop_backup
> >
>
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/functions-srf.html
Description:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/17340-74d17bbe94cb4190%40postgresql.org
This behaviour is unexpected from an external perspective but after speaking
On Sun, 2021-12-19 at 21:08 +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/continuous-archiving.html
> Description:
>
> It appears that this may be out of date.
>
> pg_stop_backup
> ---
> (0/20
