On 14.11.23 19:21, Erik Wienhold wrote:
I did not say that occurrences of "ISO 8601" should be replaced with
"RFC 3339". Just that the docs should have a cautionary note about the
SQL standard using a subset of ISO 8601 and that Postgres does not
implement (at the moment) all of its date formats
On 2023-11-13 17:23 +0100, Tom Lane wrote:
> Erik Wienhold writes:
> > On 2023-11-13 15:24 +0100, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> >> I also noticed that when people say "ISO 8601" they usually mean RFC
> >> 3389 or some subset of ISO 8601.
>
> > Forgot this fine visualization of the differences:
> > https
