Re: Documentation does not describes format for access privileges: =Tc/user

2023-12-25 Thread Tom Lane
"David G. Johnston" writes: > We probably should write the syntax like we do everywhere else: > [grantee]={privilege[*]}[…]/grantor > Then define the placeholders in the subsequent paragraph. Seems reasonable. About like this? regards, tom lane diff --git

Re: Documentation does not describes format for access privileges: =Tc/user

2023-12-25 Thread David G. Johnston
On Monday, December 25, 2023, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Monday, December 25, 2023, Eugen Konkov wrote: > >> No, it does not. If you refer to `An empty grantee field in an aclitem >> stands for PUBLIC.` then "grantee field" was never described. What is >> this? >> >> It would be very clear

Re: Documentation does not describes format for access privileges: =Tc/user

2023-12-25 Thread David G. Johnston
On Monday, December 25, 2023, Eugen Konkov wrote: > No, it does not. If you refer to `An empty grantee field in an aclitem > stands for PUBLIC.` then "grantee field" was never described. What is > this? > > It would be very clear if it was described in this way: > The access privileges has the