On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 02:18:28PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Yes, there were a few problems with my initial patch. First, I should
> have used "Z" instead of a Z which could be interpreted as a format
> specification; I had already done that for "T" in the example.
>
> Second, I was missing
No, it does not. If you refer to `An empty grantee field in an aclitem
stands for PUBLIC.` then "grantee field" was never described. What is
this?
It would be very clear if it was described in this way:
The access privileges has the following format: "grantee=privileges/who grants".
On Sun, Dec
