On 23.02.24 12:23, 小泉 悟 wrote:
Upon closer inspection, F305 is also "INTERSECT ALL table operator”.
Perhaps F302-02 would be unnecessary.
Correct, F302-02 should have been deleted. I have fixed it, thanks.
2024/02/23 18:06、Daniel Gustafsson のメール:
On 23 Feb 2024, at 06:36, PG Doc
> On 23 Feb 2024, at 12:23, 小泉 悟 wrote:
> Upon closer inspection, F305 is also "INTERSECT ALL table operator”.
> Perhaps F302-02 would be unnecessary.
The list is intended to reflect what's in the SQL:2023 standard, so whatever
the standard says we should too. I don't have a copy of the
Upon closer inspection, F305 is also "INTERSECT ALL table operator”.
Perhaps F302-02 would be unnecessary.
> 2024/02/23 18:06、Daniel Gustafsson のメール:
>
>> On 23 Feb 2024, at 06:36, PG Doc comments form
>> wrote:
>
>> The correct result would be as follows:
>>
>> F302 INTERSECT table
> On 23 Feb 2024, at 06:36, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The correct result would be as follows:
>
> F302 INTERSECT table operator
> F302-02 INTERSECT ALL table operator
> F303 INTERSECT DISTINCT table operator
> F304 EXCEPT ALL
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/features-sql-standard.html
Description:
In "D.1. Supported
Features"(https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/features-sql-standard.html),
identifiers appear as following:
F302
