On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 7:24 AM jian he wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 6:30 PM PG Doc comments form
> wrote:
> >
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> >
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/plpgsql-declarations.html
> > Description:
> >
> > Under 43.3.
"David G. Johnston" writes:
> On Saturday, April 6, 2024, PG Doc comments form
> wrote:
>> Under 43.3.1, "Notice that we omitted RETURNS real — we could have included
>> it, but it would be redundant."
>> Should that be "RETURNS tax" instead of "RETURNS real"?
> The docs are correct.
Specifical
On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 6:30 PM PG Doc comments form
wrote:
>
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/plpgsql-declarations.html
> Description:
>
> Under 43.3.1, "Notice that we omitted RETURNS real — we could have included
>
On Saturday, April 6, 2024, PG Doc comments form
wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/plpgsql-declarations.html
> Description:
>
> Under 43.3.1, "Notice that we omitted RETURNS real — we could have included
> it,
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/plpgsql-declarations.html
Description:
Under 43.3.1, "Notice that we omitted RETURNS real — we could have included
it, but it would be redundant."
Should that be "RETURNS tax" instead of "
