Re: nested tags in glossary entries in html docs

2024-04-25 Thread Alexander Lakhin
Hello, 25.04.2024 12:24, Alvaro Herrera wrote: On 2024-Apr-12, Erik Wienhold wrote: There's this bug[1] in the DocBook XSLT stylesheets. Looks like the fix[2] landed in 1.79.2 (latest version on Arch, Maybe one of these days we should get going with the migration to Docbook 5.x that Jürgen

Re: nested tags in glossary entries in html docs

2024-04-25 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On 2024-Apr-25, Jürgen Purtz wrote: > Great recommendation. I may have time in the second half of June to > pursue the migration further. There is  a performance problem, which > possibly results from our XSLT script that optimizes the > transformation-speed and works well in 4.x. Maybe a way to

Re: nested tags in glossary entries in html docs

2024-04-25 Thread Erik Wienhold
On 2024-04-25 15:40 +0200, Jürgen Purtz wrote: > On 25.04.24 13:24, Jürgen Purtz wrote: > > > > On 25.04.24 11:24, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > On 2024-Apr-12, Erik Wienhold wrote: > > > > > > > There's this bug[1] in the DocBook XSLT stylesheets. Looks like the > > > > fix[2] landed in 1.79.2

Re: nested tags in glossary entries in html docs

2024-04-25 Thread Jürgen Purtz
On 25.04.24 13:24, Jürgen Purtz wrote: On 25.04.24 11:24, Alvaro Herrera wrote: On 2024-Apr-12, Erik Wienhold wrote: There's this bug[1] in the DocBook XSLT stylesheets. Looks like the fix[2] landed in 1.79.2 (latest version on Arch, Maybe one of these days we should get going with the

Re: nested tags in glossary entries in html docs

2024-04-25 Thread Jürgen Purtz
On 25.04.24 11:24, Alvaro Herrera wrote: On 2024-Apr-12, Erik Wienhold wrote: There's this bug[1] in the DocBook XSLT stylesheets. Looks like the fix[2] landed in 1.79.2 (latest version on Arch, Maybe one of these days we should get going with the migration to Docbook 5.x that Jürgen Purtz

Re: nested tags in glossary entries in html docs

2024-04-25 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On 2024-Apr-12, Erik Wienhold wrote: > There's this bug[1] in the DocBook XSLT stylesheets. Looks like the > fix[2] landed in 1.79.2 (latest version on Arch, Maybe one of these days we should get going with the migration to Docbook 5.x that Jürgen Purtz proposed.

Re: wal_init_zero / wal_recycle

2024-04-25 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On 2024-Apr-24, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 24.04.24 10:08, Nicolas Seinlet wrote: > > It was not crystal clear to me that when wal_recycle is also ON , the > > recycled files are not filled with zeroes, because they are not > > considered as new. Could we add a sentence stating this? > > It