Hello,
25.04.2024 12:24, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On 2024-Apr-12, Erik Wienhold wrote:
There's this bug[1] in the DocBook XSLT stylesheets. Looks like the
fix[2] landed in 1.79.2 (latest version on Arch,
Maybe one of these days we should get going with the migration to
Docbook 5.x that Jürgen P
On 2024-Apr-25, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> Great recommendation. I may have time in the second half of June to
> pursue the migration further. There is a performance problem, which
> possibly results from our XSLT script that optimizes the
> transformation-speed and works well in 4.x.
Maybe a way to
On 2024-04-25 15:40 +0200, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> On 25.04.24 13:24, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> >
> > On 25.04.24 11:24, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > On 2024-Apr-12, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> > >
> > > > There's this bug[1] in the DocBook XSLT stylesheets. Looks like the
> > > > fix[2] landed in 1.79.2 (l
On 25.04.24 13:24, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
On 25.04.24 11:24, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On 2024-Apr-12, Erik Wienhold wrote:
There's this bug[1] in the DocBook XSLT stylesheets. Looks like the
fix[2] landed in 1.79.2 (latest version on Arch,
Maybe one of these days we should get going with the mi
On 25.04.24 11:24, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On 2024-Apr-12, Erik Wienhold wrote:
There's this bug[1] in the DocBook XSLT stylesheets. Looks like the
fix[2] landed in 1.79.2 (latest version on Arch,
Maybe one of these days we should get going with the migration to
Docbook 5.x that Jürgen Purtz p
On 2024-Apr-12, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> There's this bug[1] in the DocBook XSLT stylesheets. Looks like the
> fix[2] landed in 1.79.2 (latest version on Arch,
Maybe one of these days we should get going with the migration to
Docbook 5.x that Jürgen Purtz proposed.
https://postgr.es/m/21ed3fd9-90
On 2024-Apr-24, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 24.04.24 10:08, Nicolas Seinlet wrote:
> > It was not crystal clear to me that when wal_recycle is also ON , the
> > recycled files are not filled with zeroes, because they are not
> > considered as new. Could we add a sentence stating this?
>
> It cu
