"David G. Johnston" writes:
> On Thursday, July 25, 2024, PG Doc comments form
> wrote:
>> The grammar
>> [ RETURNING * | output_expression [ [ AS ] output_name ] [, ...] ]
>> seems wrong to me.
> Yes, the word returning makes it the returning clause. This should be
> written:
> [ Returning {
On Thursday, July 25, 2024, PG Doc comments form
wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/sql-insert.html
> Description:
>
> The grammar
> [ RETURNING * | output_expression [ [ AS ] output_name ] [, ...] ]
> seems wr
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/sql-insert.html
Description:
The grammar
[ RETURNING * | output_expression [ [ AS ] output_name ] [, ...] ]
seems wrong to me. I appears to say it could be either
RETURNING *
or
output_exp
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 9:50 AM PG Doc comments form
wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/parallel-plans.html
> Description:
>
> In section 15.3.4, I believe "multiple results sets" is a typo for
> "multiple
> re
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/parallel-plans.html
Description:
In section 15.3.4, I believe "multiple results sets" is a typo for "multiple
result sets". It says:
> Plans that involve appending multiple results sets c
