On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 01:25:39PM +0200, Philipp Salvisberg wrote:
> read "optional" as "mandatory".
They're optional, like in empty being optional. If not specified, the
block goes to its END.
> Therefore, I suggest to change this example by adding a NULL
> statement as in other examples. This
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 09:34:02PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-09-03 at 11:54 -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>> How about something like this?
>
> This patch looks good to me.
-Returns a code explaining the reason(s) for rewriting. The exact
-meaning of the codes
> On 10 Sep 2024, at 13:46, Oleg Sibiryakov wrote:
> 1. Since we do not want to use here, I suggest we hyphenate it as
> "built-in". What's your take on it?
I think that's the right choice given the hyphenation used in the rest of the
docs. There are a few more places on that same page which
Thank you for your feedback.
1. Since we do not want to use here, I suggest we hyphenate it
as "built-in". What's your take on it?
2. Leaving not-null is fine.
--
Oleg Sibiryakov
On 06.09.2024 16:20, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
On 5 Sep 2024, at 11:33, Oleg Sibiryakov wrote:
Dear all,
I have
