On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 09:57:04PM +0200, Koen De Groote wrote:
> I would still add that the snapshot and data copying is handled by postgres
> itself. That was the big question I was stuck with:"Who is taking this
> snapshot? Do I have to do it? Will they explain how?"
>
> Because it's left in th
I would still add that the snapshot and data copying is handled by postgres
itself. That was the big question I was stuck with:"Who is taking this
snapshot? Do I have to do it? Will they explain how?"
Because it's left in the middle who does it. Once you know how logical
replication works, it's ob
Hi,
The documentation in wal.sgml explains that old WAL files cannot be
removed or recycled until they are archived (when WAL archiving is used)
or replicated (when using replication slots). However, it did not
mention that, similarly, old WAL files are also kept until they are summarized
if WAL
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:59:51AM +0200, Koen De Groote wrote:
> Hello Bruce, thanks for picking this up.
>
> Personally, I would make explicit mention of the fact that creating the
> snapshot and copying the data is taken care of by Postgres itself. Those are
> the points that had me confused ea
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/pgprewarm.html
Description:
IMHO, in the pg_prewarm documentation, it should be mentioned that it can
prewarm indexes as well, if given an index name as input.
https://www.postgresql.org
Hello Bruce, thanks for picking this up.
Personally, I would make explicit mention of the fact that creating the
snapshot and copying the data is taken care of by Postgres itself. Those
are the points that had me confused early on, wondering if I had to perform
the copy once the snapshot was ready
> On 17 Oct 2024, at 01:24, David Rowley wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 at 11:19, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Where are we on this? I still see "#".
>
> I was hoping for some voting for or against my patch or the general idea of
> it.
Sorry for the delay, this fell off the inbox-radar. I am in f
