Dear Daniel,

Could you please provide your feedback on the last two points?
Once I have it, I will send the updated patch immediately to finalize the improvements.

Thank you,
Oleg

On 13.10.2025 13:51, Oleg wrote:
Thank you for your feedback, Daniel.
My thoughts are below:
/- Change the definition of a replication slot. + Changes the definition of a replication slot. Reading this page it seems we are mixing tense in many places, some say "Change the" and "Read some" and elsewhere we use "Drops the". Maybe a more holistic approach would be better for this page to improve consistency? /I agree, let's add "s" in all cases for the sake of consistency.

/- Not enabled by default because it is resource intensive. + Not enabled by default because it is resource-intensive. We use both spellings in multiple places, shouldn't all be changed?/

Agreed, changing all instances to "resource-intensive".

/- <command>COPY</command> and other file-access functions. + the <command>COPY</command> command and file-access functions. ... - <command>COPY</command> and other file-access functions. + the <command>COPY</command> command and file-access functions. ... - <command>COPY</command> and other functions which allow executing a + the <command>COPY</command> command and functions, which allow executing a I'm not sure about these, I think we use COPY without the the "the COPY command" decoration in many places so I think it's more consistent like this. /I actually think we should add the decoration here because "<command>COPY</command> and other file-access functions"
sounds a bit confusing since COPY is not a file-access function and we seem to 
put it in the list. Even though I
agree that everybody knows COPY is a command, not a function.

/- to call functions defined in the standard internal library, by using an + to call functions defined in the standard internal function library by using an interface similar to their SQL signature. Isn't it a bit redundant to say "internal function library" when we are already talking about function definitions?/

I agree that it may seem redundant, I added "function" here for the sake of 
consistency with lines 1829/1830 (if applied to the master branch)
where the documentation mentions "standard internal*function* library".

Please, let me know what you think of the last two points for me to send the 
updated patch.

--
Oleg Sibiryakov
On 10.10.2025 10:15, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
On 10 Sep 2025, at 09:54, Oleg<[email protected]> wrote:

Dear all,
I have prepared a patch containing some minor inconsistencies in the 
documentation. Please, take a look.
I will be looking forward to your feedback.
Thanks for the patch, while most of these are obvious improvements I have a few
comments on some:


-       Change the definition of a replication slot.
+       Changes the definition of a replication slot.
Reading this page it seems we are mixing tense in many places, some say "Change
the" and "Read some" and elsewhere we use "Drops the".  Maybe a more holistic
approach would be better for this page to improve consistency?


-       Not enabled by default because it is resource intensive.
+       Not enabled by default because it is resource-intensive.
We use both spellings in multiple places, shouldn't all be changed?


-       <command>COPY</command> and other file-access functions.
+       the <command>COPY</command> command and file-access functions.
         ...
-       <command>COPY</command> and other file-access functions.
+       the <command>COPY</command> command and file-access functions.
         ...
-       <command>COPY</command> and other functions which allow executing a
+       the <command>COPY</command> command and functions, which allow 
executing a
I'm not sure about these, I think we use COPY without the the "the COPY
command" decoration in many places so I think it's more consistent like this.


-     to call functions defined in the standard internal library, by using an
+     to call functions defined in the standard internal function library by 
using an
       interface similar to their SQL signature.
Isn't it a bit redundant to say "internal function library" when we are already
talking about function definitions?

The patch shall be applied to the REL_18_STABLE branch.
As you mentioned downthread, this is also for master.  Our workflow is to
always apply to master and backpatch from there.

--
Daniel Gustafsson


Reply via email to