On 2 Jul 2019, at 11:13, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
After the integration of figures into the documentation it may be helpful
to extent the TOC with a 'List of Figures'. Any opinion?
If yes: The same for 'List of Tables' and 'List of Examples'?
There is a simple way to enable this feature: change line
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 2:33 PM Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
>
> On 2019-05-12 10:14, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> > I noticed that in our docs for PG12 there is no SQL-2016, but we actually
> > have JSON Path implementation committed, which is a part of SQL-2016
> > standard.
I noticed that in our docs for PG12 there is no SQL-2016, but we actually
have JSON Path implementation committed, which is a part of SQL-2016
standard. One missing feature - is datetime support. Peter, will you
add this or I prepare the patch ?
Oleg
--
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgres
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:40 AM Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> * Michael Paquier (mich...@paquier.xyz) wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:00:31AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > > For the archive command:
> > > <=128 There are not errors in the PostgreSQL log (messages with seve
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 8:33 PM Jürgen Purtz wrote:
>
> After one week no response at all? Neither positive nor negative. It seems
> that the community has little interest in the SVG issue. Or in my suggestion?
First of all, I am BIG + for having diagrams in our documentation.
I once estimated
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 11:24 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Oleg Bartunov writes:
> > The commit 9b5c8d45f62bd3d243a40cc84deb93893f2f5122 is now 10+ years
> > old, may be we could remove deprecated @@@ operator ?
>
> Is it actually causing any problem? AFAICS it's just
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:48 AM Thomas Munro
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:15 AM Oleg Bartunov
> wrote:
> > Please, consider attached patch, which improves contrib/bloom documentation.
>
> Hello Oleg, I have no comment on the technical details but here is
> s
Hi,
Please, consider attached patch, which improves contrib/bloom documentation.
Best regards,
Oleg
--
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
bloom.sgml.patch
Description: Binary data
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 6:50 PM, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Oleg Bartunov writes:
>>> Attached is a small patch, which documents the maximum size of
>>> json[b] types. Probably, it's worth to patch previous re
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Oleg Bartunov writes:
>> Attached is a small patch, which documents the maximum size of
>> json[b] types. Probably, it's worth to patch previous releases, where
>> the types were introduced.
>
> If you said &q
Hi there,
Attached is a small patch, which documents the maximum size of
json[b] types. Probably, it's worth to patch previous releases, where
the types were introduced.
Best regards,
Oleg
--
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
json.sgml.patch
Descri
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> David G. Johnston wrote:
>
>> I'm not seeing the value in providing a link, especially one that we don't
>> control, here. Futhermore, we could probably drop the whole "In
>> practice..." sentence. But if not at least put a period after "li
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:59 PM, PG Doc comments form
wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/ltree.html
> Description:
>
> Hi,
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Craig Ringer writes:
>> On 26 February 2018 at 12:16, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> How can we resolve these issues?
>
>> Question the assumptions and requirements. Why do we actually _need_
>> diffable, mergeable images? Sure, it'd be *nice*, but what's
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 4:04 AM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 2/23/18 11:21, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In the distant
>> past, as I recall, we had a GIF or two; but we abandoned that on the
>> grounds that it was unmaintainable and also incompatible with some
>> documentation output formats. I'm not too
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 7:22 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 08:18:49PM +, torsten.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>>
>> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/acronyms.html
>> Description:
>>
>> Hello al
16 matches
Mail list logo
