On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 04:06:38PM -0400, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Jun-24, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > + As a safety device, an aggressive vacuum scan will
> > + occur for any table whose multixact-age (see > + linkend="vacuum-for-multixact-wraparound"/>) is greater than > +
On 2021-Jun-24, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> + As a safety device, an aggressive vacuum scan will
> + occur for any table whose multixact-age (see + linkend="vacuum-for-multixact-wraparound"/>) is greater than + linkend="guc-autovacuum-multixact-freeze-max-age"/>. Also, if the
> +
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 08:32:18AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > What does "the amount of used member storage space exceeds 50% of the
> > addressable storage space" mean?
>
> You are right. See MultiXactMemberFreezeThreshold for the whole story.
>
> What about:
>
> As a safety device, an
On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 22:50 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 08:51:00AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-06-17 at 18:31 +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > > In section "24.1.5.1. Multixacts And Wraparound" of
> > > https://ww
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 08:51:00AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-06-17 at 18:31 +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > In section "24.1.5.1. Multixacts And Wraparound" of
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/routine-vacuuming.html we find the
>
On Thu, 2021-06-17 at 18:31 +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> In section "24.1.5.1. Multixacts And Wraparound" of
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/routine-vacuuming.html we find the
> following sentence towards the end of the section:
>
> "...If the amoun
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/routine-vacuuming.html
Description:
In section "24.1.5.1. Multixacts And Wraparound" of
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/routine-vacuuming.html we find the
followin
