On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 09:24:37AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Yeah, this is just in the long tail of things to work through.
I am going through that, and found out what can be done to do coverage
reports. I will post a patch separately on -hackers.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PG
On 22.02.23 02:57, Michael Paquier wrote:
-Db_coverage is part of the core options of meson because it is not
listed in meson_options.txt, no? Documenting the switch is fine, but
it seems like we lack contents here. The paragraph describing
-Db_coverage links to regress-coverage, still this onl
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:40:12AM +0100, Jelte Fennema wrote:
> The -Dcassert and -Db_coverage of the meson build didn't show in the
> docs that they needed to be passed true or false. All other options
> specified the arguments they expected. This patch fixes that.
Indeed, values have to be spec
The -Dcassert and -Db_coverage of the meson build didn't show in the
docs that they needed to be passed true or false. All other options
specified the arguments they expected. This patch fixes that.
0001-Add-missing-meson-arguments-in-docs.patch
Description: Binary data