Re: Add missing meson arguments in docs

2023-02-28 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 09:24:37AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Yeah, this is just in the long tail of things to work through. I am going through that, and found out what can be done to do coverage reports. I will post a patch separately on -hackers. -- Michael signature.asc Description: PG

Re: Add missing meson arguments in docs

2023-02-22 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 22.02.23 02:57, Michael Paquier wrote: -Db_coverage is part of the core options of meson because it is not listed in meson_options.txt, no? Documenting the switch is fine, but it seems like we lack contents here. The paragraph describing -Db_coverage links to regress-coverage, still this onl

Re: Add missing meson arguments in docs

2023-02-21 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:40:12AM +0100, Jelte Fennema wrote: > The -Dcassert and -Db_coverage of the meson build didn't show in the > docs that they needed to be passed true or false. All other options > specified the arguments they expected. This patch fixes that. Indeed, values have to be spec

Add missing meson arguments in docs

2023-02-21 Thread Jelte Fennema
The -Dcassert and -Db_coverage of the meson build didn't show in the docs that they needed to be passed true or false. All other options specified the arguments they expected. This patch fixes that. 0001-Add-missing-meson-arguments-in-docs.patch Description: Binary data