>> Ok, I will remove the comment in all supported branches (after next
>> minor releases are out). Patch attached.
>
> +1. Looks fine to me.
Done.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
> Tatsuo Ishii writes:
>> There's a comment beginning with:
>>
>> in rules.sgml around line 2437. It seems this has been there since 2003.
>> Do we need to keep this?
>
> Well, the point is that the whole para after that is commented out.
Yes, so my question was we could safely remove the
Tatsuo Ishii writes:
> There's a comment beginning with:
>
> in rules.sgml around line 2437. It seems this has been there since 2003.
> Do we need to keep this?
Well, the point is that the whole para after that is commented out.
The para in question seems to have shown up in 20a071326, and
at
There's a comment beginning with:
in rules.sgml around line 2437. It seems this has been there since 2003.
Do we need to keep this?
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
