Background worker

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/bgworker.html Description: Hi Team, The glossary is a really nice summary of what each term means. The background worker gives a nice summary as to what it does "Background w

Re: Background worker docs,

> On 27 Aug 2021, at 16:31, Tom Lane wrote: > > Daniel Gustafsson writes: >> On 27 Aug 2021, at 16:15, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Dave's wording sounds good to me. > >> I can go make that happen, backpatched down to 9.6 AFAICT on a quick skim, >> unless you’re already on it. > > Feel free, I've got

Re: Background worker docs,

Daniel Gustafsson writes: > On 27 Aug 2021, at 16:15, Tom Lane wrote: >> Dave's wording sounds good to me. > I can go make that happen, backpatched down to 9.6 AFAICT on a quick skim, > unless you’re already on it. Feel free, I've got other stuff on my plate right now.

Re: Background worker docs,

> On 27 Aug 2021, at 16:15, Tom Lane wrote: > > Daniel Gustafsson writes: >> On 27 Aug 2021, at 15:52, Dave Cramer wrote: >>> In my mind "in the event that it crashes" made it clear > >> That, or “if it crashes” gets my vote. > > Dave's wording sounds good to me. I can go make that happen,

Re: Background worker docs,

On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 10:15, Tom Lane wrote: > Daniel Gustafsson writes: > > On 27 Aug 2021, at 15:52, Dave Cramer wrote: > >> In my mind "in the event that it crashes" made it clear > > > That, or “if it crashes” gets my vote. > > Dave's wording sounds good to me. > >

Re: Background worker docs,

Daniel Gustafsson writes: > On 27 Aug 2021, at 15:52, Dave Cramer wrote: >> In my mind "in the event that it crashes" made it clear > That, or “if it crashes” gets my vote. Dave's wording sounds good to me. regards, tom lane

Re: Background worker docs,

> On 27 Aug 2021, at 15:52, Dave Cramer wrote: > On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 09:50, Tom Lane > wrote: > Maybe s/in case/if/ ? Or s/in case/after/ ? It does seem like this > sentence needs more help than just comma-removal. > > In my mind "in the event that it crashes" ma

Re: Background worker docs,

On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 09:50, Tom Lane wrote: > Dave Cramer writes: > >> - postgres should wait before restarting the > >> process, in > >> + postgres should wait before restarting the > >> process in > > > As a native English speaker, I was left wondering what else the timeout > > would be

Re: Background worker docs,

Dave Cramer writes: >> - postgres should wait before restarting the >> process, in >> + postgres should wait before restarting the >> process in > As a native English speaker, I was left wondering what else the timeout > would be used for. Maybe s/in case/if/ ? Or s/in case/after/ ? It doe

Re: Background worker docs,

On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 09:24, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > On 27 Aug 2021, at 15:17, Dave Cramer wrote: > > > > Why is the last comma there ? > > > > "bgw_restart_time is the interval, in seconds, that postgres should wait > before restarting the process, in case it crashes." > > > - postgres

Re: Background worker docs,

> On 27 Aug 2021, at 15:17, Dave Cramer wrote: > > Why is the last comma there ? > > "bgw_restart_time is the interval, in seconds, that postgres should wait > before restarting the process, in case it crashes." > - postgres should wait before restarting the process, in > + postgres should

Background worker docs,

Why is the last comma there ? "bgw_restart_time is the interval, in seconds, that postgres should wait before restarting the process, in case it crashes." diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml index d34acfc220..6f13006e25 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml