RE: Datetime formatting

2022-01-27 Thread Kruus, Robert SPSA
Sigh, I should just go home now... From: David G. Johnston Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 10:26 AM To: Kruus, Robert SPSA ; Pg Docs Subject: Re: Datetime formatting WARNING: This message originated from a source that is not managed by SaskBuilds and Procurement, Information Technology

Re: Datetime formatting

2022-01-27 Thread David G. Johnston
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 9:13 AM PG Doc comments form wrote: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/datatype-datetime.html > > Might want to make a note that the current behavior does not match the > latest standard, but does match previous editions and/or RFC 3339. > We have such a note -

Datetime formatting

2022-01-27 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/datatype-datetime.html Description: The latest ISO 8601-1:2019 standard requires the "T" character as the separator in text representations of datetimes. RFC 3339 is more flexible and all