On Saturday, September 8, 2018, PG Doc comments form
wrote:
> the constraints shown in the table
> definition do not apply to values of the composite type outside the table.
> (A partial workaround is to use domain types as members of composite
> types.)
>
> The part:
> >(A partial workaround is
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/rowtypes.html
Description:
Hi.
On the page:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/rowtypes.html
>then the same inventory_item composite type shown above would come into
being
