Hi Michael
> Actually, looking around we use connection_name for other commands
> like EXEC SQL or DISCONNECT, so renaming connection_object to
> connection_name makes the documentation more consistent. And done.
Thank you for commiting!
Regards.
Yusuke Egashira
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:49:14AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Good catch. If you look at the code (ecpg.trailer), connection_object
> refers to the name of the parameter, while connection_name refers to
> "AS connection_object" as a whole. So it seems to me that the
> intention is to use con
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:39:27AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The "connection_name" parameter's explanation is not in Parameters
> section.
> Instead of it, "connection_object" parameter is in Parameters section. Its
> explanation seems about "connection_name".
> Is it typo about "connect
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/ecpg-sql-connect.html
Description:
The "connection_name" parameter's explanation is not in Parameters
section.
Instead of it, "connection_object" parameter is in Parameters section. Its
ex
