Re: MacPorts xsltproc is very slow?

2018-04-26 Thread Thomas Munro
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Thomas Munro > wrote: >> I think we should complain to the MacPorts packager about the >> namespace vs non-namespace stuff being possibly confused

Re: MacPorts xsltproc is very slow?

2018-03-28 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 3/22/18 18:56, Thomas Munro wrote: > I did wonder about simply changing our documentation's sourceforge.net > references to point to docbook.org instead, apparently the new home > (?) of this stuff: > > - href="http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/xhtml/chunk.xsl"/> > +

Re: MacPorts xsltproc is very slow?

2018-03-22 Thread Thomas Munro
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:27 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Thomas Munro > wrote: >> I think we should complain to the MacPorts packager about the >> namespace vs non-namespace stuff being possibly confused in the >>

Re: MacPorts xsltproc is very slow?

2018-03-02 Thread Michael Paquier
On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 09:34:58AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > Recently I've been unable to build the documentation intermittently, > and I think it's because sourceforge.net has become flakey. Let me > try right now... > > $ make docs XSLTPROC=/usr/bin/xsltproc > ...blah blah blah... >

Re: MacPorts xsltproc is very slow?

2018-03-02 Thread Thomas Munro
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Thomas Munro wrote: > I think we should complain to the MacPorts packager about the > namespace vs non-namespace stuff being possibly confused in the > packages. https://trac.macports.org/ticket/55946 -- Thomas Munro

Re: MacPorts xsltproc is very slow?

2018-03-02 Thread Thomas Munro
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 8:51 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Munro > wrote: >> So one solution is simply to uninstall the docbook-xsl package. That >> gets me back to fast documentation builds! > > For me, the

Re: MacPorts xsltproc is very slow?

2017-11-25 Thread Thomas Munro
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Alexander Lakhin wrote: > Thanks! Just to compare your results with my: > > number matchname mode Calls Tot 100us > Avg > 0 d:appendix label.markup 22503 70018988 > 3111 >