Thank you very much. The new documentation is way better.
Am 03.06.22 um 19:55 schrieb Tom Lane:
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
On 3 Jun 2022, at 17:34, Tom Lane wrote:
.. there's no longer any reason we have
to limit ourselves to one example. I propose this:
+1
Done like that, then.
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>> On 3 Jun 2022, at 17:34, Tom Lane wrote:
>> .. there's no longer any reason we have
>> to limit ourselves to one example. I propose this:
> +1
Done like that, then.
regards, tom lane
> On 3 Jun 2022, at 17:34, Tom Lane wrote:
> .. there's no longer any reason we have
> to limit ourselves to one example. I propose this:
>
> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/intarray.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/intarray.sgml
> index f930c08eeb..18c6f8c3ba 100644
> --- a/doc/src/sgml/intarray.sgml
> +++ b/doc
PG Doc comments form writes:
> The **uniq** function in the **intarray** extension removes **adjacent**
> duplicates from an integer array. The documentation[0] about this behavior
> is correct, but the example is a bit misleading, because it sorts the array
> before applying uniq. The sort can be
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/intarray.html
Description:
The **uniq** function in the **intarray** extension removes **adjacent**
duplicates from an integer array. The documentation[0] about this behavior
is correct, b
