On Mon, 2023-11-13 at 16:08 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Backpatched to PG 16.
Thanks!
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 06:22:59PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 03:42:53PM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-11-02 at 10:14 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Better, though "Is the range's upper bound unbounded?" makes me cringe.
> > >
> > > Oh, yeah, totally
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 03:42:53PM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-11-02 at 10:14 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Better, though "Is the range's upper bound unbounded?" makes me cringe.
> >
> > Oh, yeah, totally cringe, me too. :-)
> >
> > > It is not the bound that is bounded or not,
On Thu, 2023-11-02 at 10:14 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Better, though "Is the range's upper bound unbounded?" makes me cringe.
>
> Oh, yeah, totally cringe, me too. :-)
>
> > It is not the bound that is bounded or not, but the range.
> >
> > How about "Is the range unbounded at the upper
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 08:56:13AM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-11-01 at 18:03 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 09:40:43PM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > > > Yes, I agree this documentation needs help.
> > > >
> > > > For upper/lower(), it is clear that the
On Wed, 2023-11-01 at 18:03 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 09:40:43PM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > > Yes, I agree this documentation needs help.
> > >
> > > For upper/lower(), it is clear that the documentation is better saying
> > > "unspecified" rather than infinite.
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 09:40:43PM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > Yes, I agree this documentation needs help.
> >
> > For upper/lower(), it is clear that the documentation is better saying
> > "unspecified" rather than infinite. The fact that upper/lower_inf()
> > returns false for +/-Infinity
On Wed, 2023-11-01 at 16:28 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 05:28:44PM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-11-18 at 22:49 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > > On 2020/11/12 17:14, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 18:19 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > > > >
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 05:28:44PM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-11-18 at 22:49 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > On 2020/11/12 17:14, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 18:19 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > > > > Table 9.54 in page
> > > > >
On Wed, 2020-11-18 at 22:49 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2020/11/12 17:14, Laurenz Albe wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 18:19 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > > > Table 9.54 in page
> > > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-range.html states
> > > > that the
> > > > functions
On 2020/11/12 17:14, Laurenz Albe wrote:
On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 18:19 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
Table 9.54 in page
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-range.html states that the
functions lower and upper return NULL if the requested bound is infinite. If
the element type of the
On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 18:19 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > Table 9.54 in page
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-range.html states that the
> > functions lower and upper return NULL if the requested bound is infinite. If
> > the element type of the range contains the special
On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 09:25 +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> Table 9.54 in page
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-range.html states that the
> functions lower and upper return NULL if the requested bound is infinite. If
> the element type of the range contains the special
13 matches
Mail list logo
