> On 24 Jun 2025, at 07:37, Fujii Masao wrote:
> I've committed the proposed patch first. If we later agree to change
> this part as well, we can commit that separately.
What you committed is perfectly fine, thanks!
--
Daniel Gustafsson
On 2025/06/24 0:46, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2025/06/23 23:52, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
On 23 Jun 2025, at 16:40, Fujii Masao wrote:
So barring any objections, I will commit the patch.
+1, LGTM.
Thanks for the review!
There is one more occurrence though, the relnotes seem to need th
On 2025/06/23 23:52, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
On 23 Jun 2025, at 16:40, Fujii Masao wrote:
So barring any objections, I will commit the patch.
+1, LGTM.
Thanks for the review!
There is one more occurrence though, the relnotes seem to need the
same treatment as they talk about UUID f
> On 23 Jun 2025, at 16:40, Fujii Masao wrote:
> So barring any objections, I will commit the patch.
+1, LGTM. There is one more occurrence though, the relnotes seem to need the
same treatment as they talk about UUID functions and not the UUID datatype:
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/release-18.sgm
On 2025/06/21 9:55, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 11:33 PM Fujii Masao
wrote:
Hi,
Both the UUID data type and UUID functions pages define an index entry
for "UUID" that points to the data type section. As a result, the index
includes two identical entries linking to the UU
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 11:33 PM Fujii Masao
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Both the UUID data type and UUID functions pages define an index entry
> for "UUID" that points to the data type section. As a result, the index
> includes two identical entries linking to the UUID type docs,
> which seems strange.
>
