I wrote:
>> Table 27.4 is annoying: it could be made to work, just barely, with some
>> hacking of the column widths and a &zwsp; or two. But it's not stable
>> text so I have little faith in the longevity of such a solution,
>> especially if people keep on inventing long wait event names. I also
I wrote:
> Table 27.4 is annoying: it could be made to work, just barely, with some
> hacking of the column widths and a &zwsp; or two. But it's not stable
> text so I have little faith in the longevity of such a solution,
> especially if people keep on inventing long wait event names. I also
> f
