> No, it's not the example but the operator description, and what it says
> is
> "string || non-string or non-string || string"
>
> so it's trying to illustrate that there are two options:
>
> string || non-string
> non-string || string
I see, that makes a lot more sense.
> but maybe it's not s
PG Doc comments form writes:
> The second line in "Table 9.8. SQL String Functions and Operators" uses
> "non-string or non-string" as part of the example. I assume one of these
> should be "string".
It might look that way depending on how wide your browser window is...
but the way it's supposed
On 2020-May-17, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/functions-string.html
> Description:
>
> The second line in "Table 9.8. SQL String Functions and Operators" uses
> "non-string or non-str
