> On 10 May 2023, at 22:08, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>> On 10 May 2023, at 17:35, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>>> I took a look at this using macOS as the initial testbed; the TLDR is that
>>> mandoc doesn't support macros in tables, and our single-column function
>>> sig
> On 10 May 2023, at 17:35, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>> I took a look at this using macOS as the initial testbed; the TLDR is that
>> mandoc doesn't support macros in tables, and our single-column function
>> signature tables rely on that. macOS switched to mandoc in v11 I
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
> I took a look at this using macOS as the initial testbed; the TLDR is that
> mandoc doesn't support macros in tables, and our single-column function
> signature tables rely on that. macOS switched to mandoc in v11 I think, but I
> don't have an older box handy to doubl
> On 9 May 2023, at 17:14, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
> Note that formatting instructions (".PP") show in the output.
I took a look at this using macOS as the initial testbed; the TLDR is that
mandoc doesn't support macros in tables, and our single-column function
signature tables rely on that.
> On 9 May 2023, at 15:40, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
>
> The tables "pgbench Operators" and "pgbench Functions" on the pgbench man
> page (the actual man page, not the HTML reference page) look pretty garbled.
> Also, on macOS, man prints a warning that the page is invalidly formatted.
> Bu
