Re: Wrong Installation Link

I wrote: > PG Doc comments form writes: >> In Chapter 1 Section 1 (Installation), the documentation is linking to >> Chapter 17 for installing postgresql, however that chapter is titled: >> "Installation from source" > You're right, we should re-point that

Re: Wrong Installation Link

PG Doc comments form writes: > In Chapter 1 Section 1 (Installation), the documentation is linking to > Chapter 17 for installing postgresql, however that chapter is titled: > "Installation from source" And the preceding Chapter states: > "PostgreSQL is available in

Wrong Installation Link

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/tutorial-install.html Description: In Chapter 1 Section 1 (Installation), the documentation is linking to Chapter 17 for installing postgresql, however that chapter is titled

Re: Suggestion: Change link in tutorial to go to chapter 16 for binary installation

On Tue, 2025-07-22 at 23:39 +, PG Doc comments form wrote: > On the “Installation” page of the PostgreSQL 16 tutorial > ([https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/tutorial-install.html](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/tutorial-install.html)), > I expected the recommended instructions to

Suggestion: Change link in tutorial to go to chapter 16 for binary installation

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/tutorial-install.html Description: On the “Installation” page of the PostgreSQL 16 tutorial ([https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/tutorial-install.html](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16

Binary Installation Docs

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/tutorial-install.html Description: Could we add a reference to the binary installation on this page? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/tutorial-install.html

Re: intarray extension installation

On Thursday, August 29, 2024, PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/intarray.html > Description: > > Hi, > can you please specify somewhere that intarray extension is part of contrib > package

intarray extension installation

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/intarray.html Description: Hi, can you please specify somewhere that intarray extension is part of contrib package? I found this out only on a stackoverflow from almost 10 years ago. Than

Ubuntu and Debian Download/Installation instructions enhancement

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/bug-reporting.html Description: Dear PostgreSQL Documentation Team, I hope this message finds you well. As a user and admirer of PostgreSQL, I greatly appreciate the effort and detail tha

Re: In docs there is no "Installation from Binaries" section

> On 20 Aug 2023, at 18:52, David G. Johnston > wrote: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 8:56 AM PG Doc comments form > wrote: > Installing software from ZIP archive is a common practice, pgsql provides > such archive, but doesn't provide instructions on what to do with i

Re: In docs there is no "Installation from Binaries" section

On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 8:56 AM PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/install-binaries.html > Description: > > Installing software from ZIP archive is a common practice, pgsql provides > such

In docs there is no "Installation from Binaries" section

cs/current/install-binaries.html https://www.postgresqltutorial.com/postgresql-getting-started/install-postgresql/ https://www.postgresqltutorial.com/?s=zip+archive (nothing found) https://www.postgresqltutorial.com/?s=binaries (nothing found) In actual archive: .\pgsql\doc\installation-notes.ht

Re: pgAdmin 4 (APT) installation error

Hi Robert, What does `lsb_release -cs` return in your system? If you are on bionic, it should return that. If it doesn't you have a broken lsb. El dom., 27 feb. 2022 22:41, robert escribió: > Hi, > > Great work. the page: >

pgAdmin 4 (APT) installation error

Hi, Great work. the page: https://www.pgadmin.org/download/pgadmin-4-apt/ has a series of commands one of which is to create a repository the line is: sudo sh -c 'echo "debhttps://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/pgadmin/pgadmin4/apt/$(lsb_release -cs) pgadmin4 main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/pgadmin4

postgres_fdw installation

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/postgres-fdw.html Description: 1. Install the postgres_fdw extension using CREATE EXTENSION. Doesn't actually work or is a bit light on detail, some info on how to install the extension o

Re: Installation instructions vs binaries

Ah, yes it does. Thanks -- will close. //Magnus On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 5:40 PM David G. Johnston < [email protected]> wrote: > Magnus, > > [offline] > > Does this resolve the 2020-11 commitfest entry? > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/30/2726/ > > David J. > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 a

Re: Installation instructions vs binaries

Magnus, [offline] Does this resolve the 2020-11 commitfest entry? https://commitfest.postgresql.org/30/2726/ David J. On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 5:21 AM Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 1:58 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > >> > On 15 Sep 2020, at 02:43, David G. Johnston >> wr

Re: Installation instructions vs binaries

Sorry, not offline but not a big deal... On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 8:40 AM David G. Johnston < [email protected]> wrote: > Magnus, > > [offline] > >

Re: Installation instructions vs binaries

ing a pre-packaged version that the packager, and not the core team, > accepts responsibility for problem reports related to installation, on > their support channel. Please don't use pg-bugs. > > I don't think it's reasonable to expect users to be able to separat

Re: Installation instructions vs binaries

s using a > pre-packaged version that the packager, and not the core team, accepts > responsibility for problem reports related to installation, on their support > channel. Please don't use pg-bugs. I don't think it's reasonable to expect users to be able to separate bugs

Re: Installation on Cygwin

the 12 version > (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/installation-platform-notes.html > <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/installation-platform-notes.html>)? > > I can agree with that, and say that maybe that type of content is better > maintained on the wiki? At least for o

Re: Installation instructions vs binaries

prehension but that doesn't seem likely, so I would maintain status quo. That leaves just the part of adding the actual new chapter of my patch. > PFA. Thoughts on that? > I think that it is a good idea - and the patch reads well. I kinda want to be blunt, though, and point out that if t

Re: Installation instructions vs binaries

all-binaries.sgml new file mode 100644 index 00..36405e74cc --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/src/sgml/install-binaries.sgml @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ + + + Installation from Binaries + + + installation + binaries + + + + PostgreSQL is available in the form of binary + packages for most common opera

Re: Installation instructions vs binaries

Magnus Hagander writes: > I think we're talking about a different repetitiveness. If I apply Davids > suggestion to that patch, then instead of: > + > + If you are using a pre-packaged version > + of PostgreSQL, it may well have a specific > + convention for where to place the data direct

Re: Installation instructions vs binaries

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 4:27 PM Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander writes: > > And I think Davids comment about repetitive language would apply to yours > > as well, and should maybe be simplified there too? > > Per the discussion in the other thread, we concluded that being repetitive > was the o

Re: Installation instructions vs binaries

Magnus Hagander writes: > And I think Davids comment about repetitive language would apply to yours > as well, and should maybe be simplified there too? Per the discussion in the other thread, we concluded that being repetitive was the only way to be sure people would see the material at all. If

Re: Installation instructions vs binaries

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 4:06 PM Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander writes: > > Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. How about like this? > > Isn't this pretty duplicative of d2511d713? > Eh yes, I clearly missed that one -- that's what I get for forgetting to put it in the CF :) That said, I still t

Re: Installation instructions vs binaries

Magnus Hagander writes: > Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. How about like this? Isn't this pretty duplicative of d2511d713? regards, tom lane

Re: Installation instructions vs binaries

Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/filelist.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/filelist.sgml index 64b5da0070..463bdfd29c 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/filelist.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/filelist.sgml @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ + diff --git

Re: Installation on Cygwin

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 5:52 PM Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 09:40:59PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > I happened to stumble over the Cygwin section of the installation docs, > and was > > surprised to see references to not entirely bleeding-edge

Re: Installation on Cygwin

On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 09:40:59PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > I happened to stumble over the Cygwin section of the installation docs, and > was > surprised to see references to not entirely bleeding-edge Windows versions: > > "The adduser command is not supported;

Installation on Cygwin

I happened to stumble over the Cygwin section of the installation docs, and was surprised to see references to not entirely bleeding-edge Windows versions: "The adduser command is not supported; use the appropriate user management application on Windows NT, 2000, or XP. Otherwise,

Re: Installation instructions vs binaries

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 4:13 AM Magnus Hagander wrote: > It's kind of strange that if you start your PostgreSQL journey by reading > our instructions, you get nothing useful about installing PostgreSQL from > binary packages other than "go ask somebody else about it". Yet we have > pretty good st

Installation instructions vs binaries

<http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/> commit a8321c6fff84c2a6be887b824ac090c49f724f55 Author: Magnus Hagander Date: Wed Jul 15 13:12:28 2020 +0200 Expand installation documentation to cover binary installations diff --git a

Installation issue

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/bug-reporting.html Description: Now i installed postgresql but i am facing error like "There was been an error unknown error while ruining c:/WINDOWS/system32//whoami... please help to

Re: pre-requiste for installation

On 4/12/20 8:21 AM, Ankush Chawla wrote: > hi  > > what is the pre-requiste packages for Postgres Installation on SUSE Linux > > I have already transferred .run file > > What would be pre-requiste package, hardware or software requirements , > any readme available? I

pre-requiste for installation

hi what is the pre-requiste packages for Postgres Installation on SUSE Linux I have already transferred .run file What would be pre-requiste package, hardware or software requirements , any readme available? -- Best Regards, Ankush Chawla

installation

see the directories I created during the installation. Also, the 'postgres' user behaves as one of the system users, even listed among them. Can someone explain what might have possibly gone wrong? Thanks in advance