>> I'd just fix HEAD and v13. The earlier branches are not friendly
>> at all to long function descriptions.
>
> +1 from me.
Pushed to HEAD and v13.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
> I'd just fix HEAD and v13. The earlier branches are not friendly
> at all to long function descriptions.
+1 from me.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
Tatsuo Ishii writes:
> So do you think we should back-patch to existing stable branches?
I'd just fix HEAD and v13. The earlier branches are not friendly
at all to long function descriptions.
regards, tom lane
c/src/sgml/func.sgml
@@ -25102,11 +25102,11 @@ SELECT collation for ('foo' COLLATE "de_DE");
pg_wal_lsn_diff
-pg_wal_lsn_diff ( lsn pg_lsn, lsn pg_lsn )
+pg_wal_lsn_diff ( lsn1 pg_lsn, lsn2 pg_lsn )
numeric
-
Tatsuo Ishii writes:
> According to the pg_wal_lsn_diff manual:
> pg_wal_lsn_diff ( lsn pg_lsn, lsn pg_lsn ) $B"*(B numeric
> Calculates the difference in bytes between two write-ahead log
> locations. This can be used with pg_stat_replication or some of
> th
According to the pg_wal_lsn_diff manual:
pg_wal_lsn_diff ( lsn pg_lsn, lsn pg_lsn ) → numeric
Calculates the difference in bytes between two write-ahead log
locations. This can be used with pg_stat_replication or some of
the functions shown in Table 9.87 to get the replication lag
