On 2021-Oct-08, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> I remain of the opinion that the comments should be
> retained, but we can leave that for somebody else to
> decide.
So I just realized that I added this comment in 8c250f3741f.
The point of this comment is that the list of options to which
"direction" expan
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 08:43:34AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-10-11 at 23:14 -0400, rir wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 04:15:01PM -0400, rir wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 02:47:43PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2021-10-07 at 16:06 -0400, rir wrote:
> >
> > >
On Mon, 2021-10-11 at 23:14 -0400, rir wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 04:15:01PM -0400, rir wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 02:47:43PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2021-10-07 at 16:06 -0400, rir wrote:
>
> > > FETCH [ direction ] [ FROM | IN ] cursor_name
>
> Should the pgplsql d
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 04:15:01PM -0400, rir wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 02:47:43PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-10-07 at 16:06 -0400, rir wrote:
> > FETCH [ direction ] [ FROM | IN ] cursor_name
Should the pgplsql docs be similiarly changed per the above
in 43.7.3.1 and 2?
On Sun, 2021-10-10 at 16:15 -0400, rir wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 02:47:43PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-10-07 at 16:06 -0400, rir wrote:
>
>
> > So I suggest that you change the syntax diagram to
> >
> > FETCH [ direction ] [ FROM | IN ] cursor_name
>
> > Then I agree tha
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 02:47:43PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-10-07 at 16:06 -0400, rir wrote:
> So I suggest that you change the syntax diagram to
>
> FETCH [ direction ] [ FROM | IN ] cursor_name
> Then I agree that the "empty or" can be removed.
> I remain of the opinion that
rir writes:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 04:24:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, as it stands, the diagram is ambiguous
>> because there are two ways to parse
>> FETCH cursor_name
>> ... is present but empty, or omitted altogether?
> I am confident you know what you mean, but I don't. At the _pa
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 04:24:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> rir writes:
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 07:58:47AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> >> Can you think of a way to modify the syntax diagram so that it
> >> expresses that and still remains comprehensible?
>
> > For myself,
> >'FETCH [ [
On Thu, 2021-10-07 at 16:06 -0400, rir wrote:
> > > > - we should retain "empty or one of", otherwise the following syntax
> > > > would be undocumented:
>
> For myself,
>'FETCH [ [ FROM | IN ] ] '
> clearly indicates that 'direction' is optional.
Yes, but since [ FROM | IN ] is inside the
rir writes:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 07:58:47AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
>> Can you think of a way to modify the syntax diagram so that it
>> expresses that and still remains comprehensible?
> For myself,
>'FETCH [ [ FROM | IN ] ] '
> clearly indicates that 'direction' is optional.
Right
On 2021-Oct-07, rir wrote:
> For myself,
>'FETCH [ [ FROM | IN ] ] '
> clearly indicates that 'direction' is optional.
Hmm, aren't you misreading the scope of the outer square brackets? If
is optional independently of [FROM|IN], then the synopsis
should be
FETCH [ ] [ FROM | IN ]
and I
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 07:58:47AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 23:39 -0400, rir wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 08:18:22AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2021-10-01 at 21:06 -0400, rir wrote:
> > > > Minor changes to move.sgml and fetch.sgml.
> > > However, I d
On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 23:39 -0400, rir wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 08:18:22AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-10-01 at 21:06 -0400, rir wrote:
> > > Minor changes to move.sgml and fetch.sgml.
> > >
> > > The text 'or empty' is inconsistent by restating what the
> > > synopsis nota
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 08:18:22AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-10-01 at 21:06 -0400, rir wrote:
> > Minor changes to move.sgml and fetch.sgml.
> >
> > The text 'or empty' is inconsistent by restating what the
> > synopsis notation has expressed.
> >
> > The comments on sharing a lan
On Fri, 2021-10-01 at 21:06 -0400, rir wrote:
> Minor changes to move.sgml and fetch.sgml.
>
> The text 'or empty' is inconsistent by restating what the
> synopsis notation has expressed.
>
> The comments on sharing a language feature, while
> likely helpful during review, seem verbose compared t
Minor changes to move.sgml and fetch.sgml.
The text 'or empty' is inconsistent by restating what the
synopsis notation has expressed.
The comments on sharing a language feature, while
likely helpful during review, seem verbose compared to
the non-commenting in other similar files.
Thanks again,
16 matches
Mail list logo