Not clear spelling about transaction

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/continuous-archiving.html Description: >No committed transactions will be lost Hello. It is not clear to me. Did you mean: Not committed transactions will be lost Or None of committed tra

missing GRANTED BY explanations

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/sql-revoke.html Description: Hi, In the documentation for revoke command, there is no description for GRANTED BY clause. please explain that what will happen when using this clause in revo

Re: Not clear spelling about transaction

On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 1:07 PM PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/continuous-archiving.html > Description: > > >No committed transactions will be lost > > Hello. It is not clear to me. Did

Re: missing GRANTED BY explanations

On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 1:56 PM PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/sql-revoke.html > Description: > > Hi, > In the documentation for revoke command, there is no description for > GRANTED >

Re: missing GRANTED BY explanations

On Saturday, September 30, 2023, PG Doc comments form < nore...@postgresql.org> wrote: > > > In the documentation for revoke command, there is no description for > GRANTED > BY clause. > > As the doc says read the grant page for more detailed information. Repeating everything here was deemed redund