On Mon, Aug 4, 2025 at 12:30 PM David G. Johnston
wrote:
> I’m not saying it is wrong because it is impossible this will ever be
> implemented. It’s wrong because after 7 years the probability of this being
> removed are somewhere near 5% which is “unlikely”. Had it been truly likely
> it woul
On 06/09/2025 02:02, Jason Tiller wrote:
Thanks for your feedback! I'm a SQL newbie and the "implicit row constructor"
syntax was an unwelcome surprise.
The reason for it is so you can write WHERE (a, b) > (1, 2) and similar.
Perhaps WHERE ROW(a, b) > ROW(1, 2) would have been better, perha
